<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BlogWonks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogwonks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogwonks.com</link>
	<description>Opinion Matters</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on People You Don’t Want on Your Side of the Argument, Volume 439 by amfortas</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/05/04/people-you-don%e2%80%99t-want-on-your-side-of-the-argument-volume-439/#comment-11921</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpowers.com/2008/05/05/people-you-dont-want-on-your-side-volume-439/#comment-11921</guid>
		<description>America gave up spelling English properly eons ago. They even have spelling bees to make sure the wrong ways of spelling are inculcated from birth. But at least that fellow got the apostrophe in the right place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America gave up spelling English properly eons ago. They even have spelling bees to make sure the wrong ways of spelling are inculcated from birth. But at least that fellow got the apostrophe in the right place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Commander Hillary Stands &#38; Forgets to Put the Lid Down by amfortas</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/05/04/commander-hillary-stands-forgets-to-put-the-lid-down/#comment-11919</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78077#comment-11919</guid>
		<description>It has become an obligatory tradition for Presidents to poke fun at themselves in carefully orchestrated dinners and the like. A sound sense of self-depreciating humour is a must. 

Just how Hilary is thinking of that little feature of American public life must keep her awake at night in ever glowing sheets. She no doubt thinks she is funny but when push comes to shove she will likely come across as having humour in a jugular vein.

Maybe she will just restrict her performances to slapping some poor chap's face - that always gets a laugh. Or maybe whacking a fellow diner with a tureen spoon. And tip the tureen over some poor visiting Ambassador's head for the encore.

As for the Commander-in-Chief part, well.... I am reminded of James Garner and Jack Lemmon who did a film about ex-Presidents some time ago. There was a scene in a car where they disclosed to one another the words they each had for the 'Hail to the Chief' tune. Words they had made up. Hilarious. "Hail to the Chief coz the Chiefs a nasty bastard...." or something along those lines.

What will Hilary make up, I wonder. The White House bedroom floor will be littered with scribbled bits of headed paper each morning as she struggles to get just the right feminist tone.

'Hail to the Chief
That's we who wears the Pants-Suit.
Praise our lovely hair
Or we'll poke you in the eye

A kick to the groin
Is our Foreign policee plan
A whack with a fry pan
to any passing man'.

Maybe you should have a competition Joyanna. But wherever you do, don't ask me about my words for when I am President. I keep writing new ones. I am favouring some lines at the moment about how a spray from the Amfortas can will beat B.O. but I am having trouble with the scan as there are also lines about chopping arms off so there will be a lot of quite airy armpits around. 

It all creative go, this Prsidential lark.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has become an obligatory tradition for Presidents to poke fun at themselves in carefully orchestrated dinners and the like. A sound sense of self-depreciating humour is a must. </p>
<p>Just how Hilary is thinking of that little feature of American public life must keep her awake at night in ever glowing sheets. She no doubt thinks she is funny but when push comes to shove she will likely come across as having humour in a jugular vein.</p>
<p>Maybe she will just restrict her performances to slapping some poor chap&#039;s face - that always gets a laugh. Or maybe whacking a fellow diner with a tureen spoon. And tip the tureen over some poor visiting Ambassador&#039;s head for the encore.</p>
<p>As for the Commander-in-Chief part, well&#8230;. I am reminded of James Garner and Jack Lemmon who did a film about ex-Presidents some time ago. There was a scene in a car where they disclosed to one another the words they each had for the &#039;Hail to the Chief&#039; tune. Words they had made up. Hilarious. &#034;Hail to the Chief coz the Chiefs a nasty bastard&#8230;.&#034; or something along those lines.</p>
<p>What will Hilary make up, I wonder. The White House bedroom floor will be littered with scribbled bits of headed paper each morning as she struggles to get just the right feminist tone.</p>
<p>&#039;Hail to the Chief<br />
That&#039;s we who wears the Pants-Suit.<br />
Praise our lovely hair<br />
Or we&#039;ll poke you in the eye</p>
<p>A kick to the groin<br />
Is our Foreign policee plan<br />
A whack with a fry pan<br />
to any passing man&#039;.</p>
<p>Maybe you should have a competition Joyanna. But wherever you do, don&#039;t ask me about my words for when I am President. I keep writing new ones. I am favouring some lines at the moment about how a spray from the Amfortas can will beat B.O. but I am having trouble with the scan as there are also lines about chopping arms off so there will be a lot of quite airy armpits around. </p>
<p>It all creative go, this Prsidential lark.  <img src='http://blogwonks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Husbands SHOULDN&#039;T do Half the Housework by Joyanna Adams</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/30/why-husbands-shouldnt-do-half-the-housework/#comment-11773</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyanna Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78043#comment-11773</guid>
		<description>wow...amfortas, that was one of your better rants! My husband mowed the lawn today, a job that I usually do, but I smashed my foot yesterday, so there you go...

I feel very guilty now knowing what a sweat he had to work up because I was attacked by frozen hamburger jumping out of my frig......whew! I'm getting thirsty just reading you!

Now, explain the French Maid....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;amfortas, that was one of your better rants! My husband mowed the lawn today, a job that I usually do, but I smashed my foot yesterday, so there you go&#8230;</p>
<p>I feel very guilty now knowing what a sweat he had to work up because I was attacked by frozen hamburger jumping out of my frig&#8230;&#8230;whew! I&#039;m getting thirsty just reading you!</p>
<p>Now, explain the French Maid&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recession Obsession by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/05/01/recession-obsession/#comment-11678</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 10:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsidethewire.mensnewsdaily.com/?p=3283#comment-11678</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No, because save for the fact they tax gasoline, they have very little effect on the markets.&lt;/i&gt;

That's usually true.  But between them not letting us drill, and them forcing us to burn food in our tanks, they most definitely ARE having an effect on our wallets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No, because save for the fact they tax gasoline, they have very little effect on the markets.</i></p>
<p>That&#039;s usually true.  But between them not letting us drill, and them forcing us to burn food in our tanks, they most definitely ARE having an effect on our wallets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mexico Comes To Flowers! by amfortas</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/05/01/mexico-comes-to-flowers/#comment-11661</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78048#comment-11661</guid>
		<description>Ah, an article in the 'Revolutionary' spirit. For a change, we have to supply the words. Why wait for an author - go straight to the commentary !

(In case you post it again, all I am getting at the moment is the Title and a tag.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, an article in the &#039;Revolutionary&#039; spirit. For a change, we have to supply the words. Why wait for an author - go straight to the commentary !</p>
<p>(In case you post it again, all I am getting at the moment is the Title and a tag.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rapture, False Prediction Number 435,834 by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/05/01/the-rapture-false-prediction-number-435834/#comment-11658</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpowers.com/2008/05/02/the-rapture-false-prediction-number-435834/#comment-11658</guid>
		<description>I Pray for His return, regularly.  He will fix everything.

But until then, life goes on.  Go to work, feed the kids, and enjoy what you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Pray for His return, regularly.  He will fix everything.</p>
<p>But until then, life goes on.  Go to work, feed the kids, and enjoy what you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Husbands SHOULDN&#039;T Do Half the Housework by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/05/01/why-husbands-shouldnt-do-half-the-housework-2/#comment-11624</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78049#comment-11624</guid>
		<description>Do housework.  Lot's of it.  Then wonder why she treats you like dirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do housework.  Lot&#039;s of it.  Then wonder why she treats you like dirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Husbands SHOULDN&#039;T do Half the Housework by amfortas</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/30/why-husbands-shouldnt-do-half-the-housework/#comment-11618</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78043#comment-11618</guid>
		<description>Marty, one has to understand that housework is considered as foreplay by women. With the pressures on gender relations today, she is desperate.

For him, foreplay is fraught with problems. Men prefer 30 to 45 Seconds of foreplay, less if at all possible. For the man, driving back to her place is considered a part of foreplay. 

No woman understands why this is.

Women prefer 30 to 45 Minutes of foreplay, in addition to a bubbly spa with Champagne and dinner out; and if she is in a  ‘relationship’, the usual source of all these studies, him doing the washing up, vacuuming, putting out the rubbish and mowing the lawn.

As well as grocery shopping, washing &#38; ironing, putting up shelves, re-arranging the furniture. She loves it when the furniture moves around at her command.

And begging. 

This adds another 12 hours on average to his workload; sometimes a whole week. (Mean 12 hours, S.D. 5 days)

It is a mystery to him why these things didn’t turn her on when she was single and did them all herself. (Apart from the begging)

She “needs” to be turned on to, and by, him, each time, generally with some effort on his part. The housework never ends but waits until the afterglow of her last orgasm wears off. Usually about ten minutes.

She expects him to be turned on to her all the time she’s there. Only her. Not the hem of any old dress. Not by any other female. Not by his own hormones.  Her. And the washing up. He is to be totally disinterested any time she is out of his sight, and when she is out he must be mopping the bathroom in preparation.

He has to initiate. He has to reach out to her, be sexually adventurous, interesting, open, inventive and daring. And have the ironing done, the cutlery polished and the pantry shelves all emptied, cleaned and the items rearranged with the tall items at the back. "Pantries before Panties" is what she learned from her mother.

She wants to be ‘taken’. First to the new shelves and then to watch him arrange the nick-knacks to her raise her to fever-pitch.

She sees sex as a form of ‘communication’.  She wants to know his most secret sexual thoughts. His history and experience with other women. His fantasies. She wants him to ‘Talk to her’. She wants to know what he is thinking as he is cleaning the stove; what special washing cycles did these other women like.

He is reluctant. He wants to avoid this. He thinks she will not like it. So, he asks for her secret thoughts, fantasies, history etc., too, to head it off.

Mistake.

She lists between 170 and 500 (approx) men who all ‘pursued her relentlessly‘ cleaning fluids in hand, and to whom some she ‘gave in to’, was ‘swept away’ by, or was ‘forced to do it for /to him’, and were all either fantastic in bed or total jerks who wilted at those difficult corners and stairs. 

Her fantasies are few and involve a 19th Century, Crinoline, a hooped dress and a fan. Mops and buckets feaature for most women. Harpsichords and Lutes have been mentioned in some of the more exotic women’s admissions. She doesn’t have any sexual thoughts at all unless she’s with him; and they are about herself and Jiffy Cloths. She does not use a single rude word. She swears it’s the truth.

He believes her. He tells her.  All. The truth, too.  

He confesses about all three women and even the one whose name he doesn’t remember any more. And the little red-headed girl in his third grade class that he adored from afar and never spoke to.

To be fair. 

She hates them. 

Her eyes narrow. 

He tells of his fantasies. They often involve several people, some entirely fictitious. They are quite focused on sexual pleasure with a lot of grinning. And in many forms, all ending with very satisfied smiles and exhaustion all around. 

And sweat.

Lots of fluids.

She hates him.  None are antiseptic fluids. He talks ‘dirty’. But he never mentions washing the sheets and changing the pillow-cases. She reaches for the tissue box and berates him for 'hiding' it deliberately in a drawer.

The more initiating, adventurous, daring, interesting, inventive, communicative, open and reaching out to her he is, the
more ‘demanding’, ‘needy’ or ‘perverted’ he is likely to be considered. 

That means an extra two weeks of Ajax and Mr Clean for him.

For him, foreplay is more than just very complicated. 

It is terrifying. And friggin' exhausting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty, one has to understand that housework is considered as foreplay by women. With the pressures on gender relations today, she is desperate.</p>
<p>For him, foreplay is fraught with problems. Men prefer 30 to 45 Seconds of foreplay, less if at all possible. For the man, driving back to her place is considered a part of foreplay. </p>
<p>No woman understands why this is.</p>
<p>Women prefer 30 to 45 Minutes of foreplay, in addition to a bubbly spa with Champagne and dinner out; and if she is in a  ‘relationship’, the usual source of all these studies, him doing the washing up, vacuuming, putting out the rubbish and mowing the lawn.</p>
<p>As well as grocery shopping, washing &amp; ironing, putting up shelves, re-arranging the furniture. She loves it when the furniture moves around at her command.</p>
<p>And begging. </p>
<p>This adds another 12 hours on average to his workload; sometimes a whole week. (Mean 12 hours, S.D. 5 days)</p>
<p>It is a mystery to him why these things didn’t turn her on when she was single and did them all herself. (Apart from the begging)</p>
<p>She “needs” to be turned on to, and by, him, each time, generally with some effort on his part. The housework never ends but waits until the afterglow of her last orgasm wears off. Usually about ten minutes.</p>
<p>She expects him to be turned on to her all the time she’s there. Only her. Not the hem of any old dress. Not by any other female. Not by his own hormones.  Her. And the washing up. He is to be totally disinterested any time she is out of his sight, and when she is out he must be mopping the bathroom in preparation.</p>
<p>He has to initiate. He has to reach out to her, be sexually adventurous, interesting, open, inventive and daring. And have the ironing done, the cutlery polished and the pantry shelves all emptied, cleaned and the items rearranged with the tall items at the back. &#034;Pantries before Panties&#034; is what she learned from her mother.</p>
<p>She wants to be ‘taken’. First to the new shelves and then to watch him arrange the nick-knacks to her raise her to fever-pitch.</p>
<p>She sees sex as a form of ‘communication’.  She wants to know his most secret sexual thoughts. His history and experience with other women. His fantasies. She wants him to ‘Talk to her’. She wants to know what he is thinking as he is cleaning the stove; what special washing cycles did these other women like.</p>
<p>He is reluctant. He wants to avoid this. He thinks she will not like it. So, he asks for her secret thoughts, fantasies, history etc., too, to head it off.</p>
<p>Mistake.</p>
<p>She lists between 170 and 500 (approx) men who all ‘pursued her relentlessly‘ cleaning fluids in hand, and to whom some she ‘gave in to’, was ‘swept away’ by, or was ‘forced to do it for /to him’, and were all either fantastic in bed or total jerks who wilted at those difficult corners and stairs. </p>
<p>Her fantasies are few and involve a 19th Century, Crinoline, a hooped dress and a fan. Mops and buckets feaature for most women. Harpsichords and Lutes have been mentioned in some of the more exotic women’s admissions. She doesn’t have any sexual thoughts at all unless she’s with him; and they are about herself and Jiffy Cloths. She does not use a single rude word. She swears it’s the truth.</p>
<p>He believes her. He tells her.  All. The truth, too.  </p>
<p>He confesses about all three women and even the one whose name he doesn’t remember any more. And the little red-headed girl in his third grade class that he adored from afar and never spoke to.</p>
<p>To be fair. </p>
<p>She hates them. </p>
<p>Her eyes narrow. </p>
<p>He tells of his fantasies. They often involve several people, some entirely fictitious. They are quite focused on sexual pleasure with a lot of grinning. And in many forms, all ending with very satisfied smiles and exhaustion all around. </p>
<p>And sweat.</p>
<p>Lots of fluids.</p>
<p>She hates him.  None are antiseptic fluids. He talks ‘dirty’. But he never mentions washing the sheets and changing the pillow-cases. She reaches for the tissue box and berates him for &#039;hiding&#039; it deliberately in a drawer.</p>
<p>The more initiating, adventurous, daring, interesting, inventive, communicative, open and reaching out to her he is, the<br />
more ‘demanding’, ‘needy’ or ‘perverted’ he is likely to be considered. </p>
<p>That means an extra two weeks of Ajax and Mr Clean for him.</p>
<p>For him, foreplay is more than just very complicated. </p>
<p>It is terrifying. And friggin&#039; exhausting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday’s Column: Newt’s Progression from Conservative Leader to Gore Lap Dog by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/27/monday%e2%80%99s-column-newt%e2%80%99s-progression-from-conservative-leader-to-gore-lap-dog/#comment-11564</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpowers.com/2008/04/28/mondays-column-newts-progression-from-conservative-leader-to-gore-lap-dog/#comment-11564</guid>
		<description>Hard to believe what a measly little million bucks will make a man do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe what a measly little million bucks will make a man do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Absence by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/25/absence/#comment-11544</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2008/04/25/absence/#comment-11544</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I take satisfaction in knowing they’ve lost money on the deal.&lt;/i&gt;

Now if only we had "loser pays", so you weren't out a lot of money, this might actually be a little fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I take satisfaction in knowing they’ve lost money on the deal.</i></p>
<p>Now if only we had &#034;loser pays&#034;, so you weren&#039;t out a lot of money, this might actually be a little fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nobody Hoards Rice by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/24/nobody-hoards-rice/#comment-11542</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78004#comment-11542</guid>
		<description>Look at the bright side, Art.  Neither dem has a chance in hell of winning.  

Of course if JohnMc isn't any better, then.......  Oh never mind.  We're going to Hell.  I guess I'll go buy some handbasket futures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the bright side, Art.  Neither dem has a chance in hell of winning.  </p>
<p>Of course if JohnMc isn&#039;t any better, then&#8230;&#8230;.  Oh never mind.  We&#039;re going to Hell.  I guess I&#039;ll go buy some handbasket futures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Save the Earth? Yawn! by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/24/save-the-earth-yawn/#comment-11541</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78003#comment-11541</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;we resort to using corn to churn out Ethanol. This has driven up the price of corn. It makes no sense with food prices going up these days.&lt;/i&gt;

Burning corn in our tanks is the &lt;b&gt;cause&lt;/b&gt; of food prices shooting through the roof.  I (and my neighbors) complain about it.  Poor countries are rioting (and starving).  Thanks, Algore.  (Though the smaller world population we end up with just &lt;i&gt;may&lt;/i&gt; be Al's purpose.)

And by the way, these people &lt;b&gt;do&lt;/b&gt; worship the earth and all things in it (except people).  They don't just hug trees, they look up to them.  These "environmentalists" are the New Druids.  In their sick, twisted minds, the world would be better off without people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>we resort to using corn to churn out Ethanol. This has driven up the price of corn. It makes no sense with food prices going up these days.</i></p>
<p>Burning corn in our tanks is the <b>cause</b> of food prices shooting through the roof.  I (and my neighbors) complain about it.  Poor countries are rioting (and starving).  Thanks, Algore.  (Though the smaller world population we end up with just <i>may</i> be Al&#039;s purpose.)</p>
<p>And by the way, these people <b>do</b> worship the earth and all things in it (except people).  They don&#039;t just hug trees, they look up to them.  These &#034;environmentalists&#034; are the New Druids.  In their sick, twisted minds, the world would be better off without people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nobody Hoards Rice by Artfldgr</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/24/nobody-hoards-rice/#comment-11519</link>
		<dc:creator>Artfldgr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78004#comment-11519</guid>
		<description>The rest of the world is finding out how much the american economy was subsidizing their life by subsidizing corn and other grains and then having them be sold around the world at that price. 

what they are finding out is that the people they have been hating, have been making it possible for them to have a better life. 

technically they are going to find out how much their food really costs when american workers are not paying half the cost before its grown. 

the biggest thing on this isnt china so much, its our ethanol. and if you go to BOTH dems websites you can see that they plan to make this all a lot worse...  

which then makes everyone mad that we are no longer subsidizing their hatred and contempt of us while they have a meal. 

gong to be a sad scary time in the next few decades. historically speaking, we are in for one of those old time wars that we thought were over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rest of the world is finding out how much the american economy was subsidizing their life by subsidizing corn and other grains and then having them be sold around the world at that price. </p>
<p>what they are finding out is that the people they have been hating, have been making it possible for them to have a better life. </p>
<p>technically they are going to find out how much their food really costs when american workers are not paying half the cost before its grown. </p>
<p>the biggest thing on this isnt china so much, its our ethanol. and if you go to BOTH dems websites you can see that they plan to make this all a lot worse&#8230;  </p>
<p>which then makes everyone mad that we are no longer subsidizing their hatred and contempt of us while they have a meal. </p>
<p>gong to be a sad scary time in the next few decades. historically speaking, we are in for one of those old time wars that we thought were over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-Feminist Beliefs &#38; Criticism, Or One Feminist&#039;s Impressions by amfortas</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/24/anti-feminist-beliefs-criticism-or-one-feminists-impressions/#comment-11498</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=78000#comment-11498</guid>
		<description>Nice to see you here, Kelly. 

The counter-arguments to blinkered feminists need to be repeated over and over it seems. And they do go on and on repeating the same tired old mendacities, don't they. Go to it, good woman and more empowerment to your blog.

If anyone is going to be heard repudiating feminism, it is women. The Lord Harry knows that men are't heard.

By the way, my good friend Percy sends a wink.

And, 

Vote#1 Amfortas. The Gnome's sword is longer than his legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see you here, Kelly. </p>
<p>The counter-arguments to blinkered feminists need to be repeated over and over it seems. And they do go on and on repeating the same tired old mendacities, don&#039;t they. Go to it, good woman and more empowerment to your blog.</p>
<p>If anyone is going to be heard repudiating feminism, it is women. The Lord Harry knows that men are&#039;t heard.</p>
<p>By the way, my good friend Percy sends a wink.</p>
<p>And, </p>
<p>Vote#1 Amfortas. The Gnome&#039;s sword is longer than his legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Five Year Wars: Iraq and the Seminole by amfortas</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/22/five-year-wars-iraq-and-the-seminole/#comment-11429</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=77987#comment-11429</guid>
		<description>As far as I am aware, the Seminole are the only Indian Tribe that has not signed a Peace Treaty with America. Technically they are still at war. Now, I may be wrong. Someone may try to correct me.

If they do try, however, I will declare war too and I can promise that I will hold out on my maountain even if surrounded by General Patreus and the whole Army accompanied by the West Point Marching Band and Display Squadron. 

You'll never take meeee, youuu dirty rats. 

I expect to get a casino at the very least.

This is all speculative of course. I am closing on Obama in the Primaries according to Jim Lehrer's Newshour and fully expect to be swept into  power on massed shoulders with that same marching band in the lead. So the war option is simply a fall-back position in the event Hilary cheats, again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I am aware, the Seminole are the only Indian Tribe that has not signed a Peace Treaty with America. Technically they are still at war. Now, I may be wrong. Someone may try to correct me.</p>
<p>If they do try, however, I will declare war too and I can promise that I will hold out on my maountain even if surrounded by General Patreus and the whole Army accompanied by the West Point Marching Band and Display Squadron. </p>
<p>You&#039;ll never take meeee, youuu dirty rats. </p>
<p>I expect to get a casino at the very least.</p>
<p>This is all speculative of course. I am closing on Obama in the Primaries according to Jim Lehrer&#039;s Newshour and fully expect to be swept into  power on massed shoulders with that same marching band in the lead. So the war option is simply a fall-back position in the event Hilary cheats, again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nobody Reports on a Monday: Let&#039;s All Just Leave&#8230; by amfortas</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/20/nobody-reports-on-a-monday-lets-all-just-leave/#comment-11401</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=77937#comment-11401</guid>
		<description>Estne volumen in toga, Joyanna, an solum tibi libet me videre? *1. I am always happy to see you.

My but we are a shade harsh with Cardinal Rottwieler today. He's been growling quietly for a while now but so far hasn't bitten anyone's arse. Bitter? Pretty bitter. That's the German bitter not the taste. Or if you like, Te precor dulcissime supplex! (Pretty please with a cherry on top!).

Mexicans in your church soon? Just so long as they bring the Tridentime Mass back with them. None of this vernacular from any old small village. Let's all understand what's being said. Bring the Universal language back from the dead. Googlismus.

I think the Pope's idea of a One World Order differes markedly from that of the plethora of socialists we have spreading like the plague. Big G is in there somewhere - or His son. Son I think.  They are a sort of Divine Burning Bushes intent on uniting the whole world with sweetness and light - maybe after a bit of localised biffo.

But I don't think the Pope is activly working with George or Hillarious or the darkie fellow, Seantor Wossname. (I.m unsure of McCain. Wake him up and ask him) But then, who knows. Sentio aliquos togatos contra me conspirare.*2


*1 - Is that a scroll in your toga, Joyanna, or are you just happy to see me? 

*2 - I think some people in togas are plotting against me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estne volumen in toga, Joyanna, an solum tibi libet me videre? *1. I am always happy to see you.</p>
<p>My but we are a shade harsh with Cardinal Rottwieler today. He&#039;s been growling quietly for a while now but so far hasn&#039;t bitten anyone&#039;s arse. Bitter? Pretty bitter. That&#039;s the German bitter not the taste. Or if you like, Te precor dulcissime supplex! (Pretty please with a cherry on top!).</p>
<p>Mexicans in your church soon? Just so long as they bring the Tridentime Mass back with them. None of this vernacular from any old small village. Let&#039;s all understand what&#039;s being said. Bring the Universal language back from the dead. Googlismus.</p>
<p>I think the Pope&#039;s idea of a One World Order differes markedly from that of the plethora of socialists we have spreading like the plague. Big G is in there somewhere - or His son. Son I think.  They are a sort of Divine Burning Bushes intent on uniting the whole world with sweetness and light - maybe after a bit of localised biffo.</p>
<p>But I don&#039;t think the Pope is activly working with George or Hillarious or the darkie fellow, Seantor Wossname. (I.m unsure of McCain. Wake him up and ask him) But then, who knows. Sentio aliquos togatos contra me conspirare.*2</p>
<p>*1 - Is that a scroll in your toga, Joyanna, or are you just happy to see me? </p>
<p>*2 - I think some people in togas are plotting against me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linda Lovelace, Phyllis Schlafly, and Juanita Broaddrick by amfortas</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/21/linda-lovelace-phyllis-schlafly-and-juanita-broaddrick/#comment-11400</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogwonks.com/?p=77941#comment-11400</guid>
		<description>Poor Linda wasn't empowered and didn't have choices. What a scandal. I put it down to that era's poor education for girls, myself. Classroom after classroom of cooking and sewing with an occasional sniff of a basic maths book, just to show those girls what they were incapable of and rubbing their little snub noses in. And not a hint of a sex ed class - heaven forbid! It is hardly surprising she ended up gobbling lots of strange men's private parts infront of a camera. 

Thank goodness all that has been changed by much needed feminism. Now we have billions of dollars devoted entirly to raising the self-esteem of girls; fast-track into quadratic equations for tiny tot girls; an almost entirely female dominated education workforce (wash you mouf out, Amfortas. Only MEN !! (tm), 'dominate'); and an internet awash with women all outdoing Linda in kind and degree and showing just what empowerment and chices do to make the world a much better place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Linda wasn&#039;t empowered and didn&#039;t have choices. What a scandal. I put it down to that era&#039;s poor education for girls, myself. Classroom after classroom of cooking and sewing with an occasional sniff of a basic maths book, just to show those girls what they were incapable of and rubbing their little snub noses in. And not a hint of a sex ed class - heaven forbid! It is hardly surprising she ended up gobbling lots of strange men&#039;s private parts infront of a camera. </p>
<p>Thank goodness all that has been changed by much needed feminism. Now we have billions of dollars devoted entirly to raising the self-esteem of girls; fast-track into quadratic equations for tiny tot girls; an almost entirely female dominated education workforce (wash you mouf out, Amfortas. Only MEN !! &#8482;, &#039;dominate&#039;); and an internet awash with women all outdoing Linda in kind and degree and showing just what empowerment and chices do to make the world a much better place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gore By Example by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/20/gore-by-example/#comment-11399</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsidethewire.mensnewsdaily.com/?p=3213#comment-11399</guid>
		<description>What's really funny is, if you've seen the high-res photo at the top, you can tell he's watching Fox News.  He can't stomach what he preaches.

But at least he's got a cute, Amazonian tree frog on his wall.  I bet he tried to lick it, at least once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s really funny is, if you&#039;ve seen the high-res photo at the top, you can tell he&#039;s watching Fox News.  He can&#039;t stomach what he preaches.</p>
<p>But at least he&#039;s got a cute, Amazonian tree frog on his wall.  I bet he tried to lick it, at least once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Study Attacks Newspapers by Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/19/study-attacks-newspapers/#comment-11397</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=79513#comment-11397</guid>
		<description>anti armchair generals, you're blaming "government" for newspapers lies.  You're saying they just pass on "governments" lies without checking.  Only if it falls into a newspapers narrow category of "important news".  What we used to call "propaganda".

Not to say "government never lies", but newspapers are dying because of self-inflicted wounds.  The NYT is whining about loss of circulation and yet it continues to do the same old, same old.  Even as they collapse they blame others.  It couldn't be because they just make stuff up, and everyone knows it (except a few die-hard libs who don't care - but there's not enough of them to float anything).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anti armchair generals, you&#039;re blaming &#034;government&#034; for newspapers lies.  You&#039;re saying they just pass on &#034;governments&#034; lies without checking.  Only if it falls into a newspapers narrow category of &#034;important news&#034;.  What we used to call &#034;propaganda&#034;.</p>
<p>Not to say &#034;government never lies&#034;, but newspapers are dying because of self-inflicted wounds.  The NYT is whining about loss of circulation and yet it continues to do the same old, same old.  Even as they collapse they blame others.  It couldn&#039;t be because they just make stuff up, and everyone knows it (except a few die-hard libs who don&#039;t care - but there&#039;s not enough of them to float anything).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Study Attacks Newspapers by college activist</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/19/study-attacks-newspapers/#comment-11395</link>
		<dc:creator>college activist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=79513#comment-11395</guid>
		<description>With the advent of the internet, mainstream media is gonna have to start getting their act together, or risk obscurity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the advent of the internet, mainstream media is gonna have to start getting their act together, or risk obscurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
