BlogWonks

 
It’s amazing what there is on the internet. A geneological researcher has emailed me with three pictures of Obama’s mother in the nude. That would be of trivial interest except for the setting in which the picures were taken. They were clearly taken in a sophisticated mid-century apartment and my correspondent suggests that the apartment details could be used to identify the photographer. He feels that the photographer is the Communist “Frank” whom Obama mentions as his mentor. That Frank was so intimate with Obama’s mother would support the contention that Frank was in fact Obama’s father. Various bloggers have pointed out how similar Obama looks to “Frank” and the coverup of Obama’s birth certificate is certainly very suspicious.

I will not post the pictures here as Google would undoubtedly take down this blog as soon as I did. Instead, I have posted the pictures here and here and here.

I give below part of the email from my correspondent:

By pure serendipity I found a photo of what I believe is Stanley Ann Dunham; two more I found through sheer plod. They are taken before Christmas by the decorations and unopened presents. Also a stereo and records that an expert could confirm as jazz records are in view.There is a distinctive grain to the wood floors. I do research including genealogical and had downloaded everything I could find. Not much. So when I saw the picture, I locked on the the ear lobes, chin, eyebrows. It is she. A nude photo,not distasteful, but posed, I believe, by a mature man who knows what he likes, including jazz and now we know young girls. One could ascertain the location of where the photos were taken.

And the shoes..not indigenous to Hawaii,but maybe not unsual for Helen Canfield Chicago socialite and Marshall’s second wife. The photos are important in the sense that they explain the going to Chicago and the immediate acceptance by the hard left, if his father is Frank Marshall Davis, not just his mentor.

More background on Obama here.

It was the article over at Fox: Japanese Firm Creates Robot Girlfriend for Lonely Men  that got me thinking about the implications of things that are coming around the corner in the near future.

Finally, women are not the only ones who can have a lover that needs batteries. Plumbing the new depths of markets Sega has delved into the market of men who “just wont commit”, and has given them a companion, and a helpmeet. Ok, not much of a helpmeet, Ema can only give out business cards. Ema also can only kiss and will never be ready for the boudoir in this incarnation, though some men say they are already used to this any way.

While Ema is “diminutive” by dating standards for pretty much all men (except perhaps the deceased Tom Thumb of Barnum fame), Ema stands a bit taller and has the old figure that Barbie can only now dream of. Though with a September price tag of $175 (in Japan), Ema is a bit pricier than a Bratz doll, but she moves. 

Who ever thought, that when women decided to make men as irrelevant as bicycles for fish, that the men might decide to use the same skills they used to create a society that thinks it doesn’t need them, and invent a woman to be a new companion and helpmeet for them? 

Granted, most men will not get far with a woman that is only 15 inches tall, though the situation will not stay that way forever. Real Doll is another version that doesn’t move. Real Doll makes up for it by being attractive, life size, and has parts that I suppose work good enough since her price tag is pretty high. 

If you have paid attention then you might have noticed that other companies are making robots that are getting better and better. That it will not be long before they will look good enough for a lot of things. Discussions in some science circles of man machine love and marriage have been written and published recently.  All of this raises some very interesting questions in the future.

Will man machine weddings take place?

Will the average man (or woman) be able to enjoy any adventure a la Westworld,

Will the perversions that are illegal today, be perfectly find since it’s only a mechanical machine that someone is with?

After all, would it be illegal for a brothel that offered such machines that literally could be made to cover categories that the typical twisted mind could never dream of partaking in?

Given that the female version of the bunny ranch didn’t quite make it, what does this say for the future of what women will experience?

They are already experience the men who have no purpose that play video games and now can have a little friend to keep them company. They don’t seem to like that kind of guy much, so I am unsure what their solution will be.

In the future, in a world where couples don’t need to marry, and the structure of home life is collapsing, it is interesting that the modern woman will literally end up competing against a stepford wife, and rental models.

Hotels would start stocking them: “hello? Room service? Hi! Could you send up Ms robojoy to room 2112? Thank you!”

I would suspect that women would pine for the days like today in which its only hard to find a man, not impossible to peel him away from the only product that might catch his attention quite a bit more than two sports seasons.

One thing for certain is that Sega is going to make a lot of money. Even on just the novelty of it. They hope to sell 10,000 units in the first year, and I suspect that they wont be able to make them fast enough for a while.

The rest will only be a matter of time.

Of course the kind of man that we used to have wouldn’t have thought a machine would be a decent choice. Now all that has changed in  so many ways, what was impossible in the past, is very likely in the future.

Bout the only advice I could offer would be that you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. So if you visit your new squeeze, and you see a 15 inch competitor there flipping you a business card, remember it was 100 years ago when the main means of transportation was still a horse and cars were just coming on the scene.

Tomorrow comes pretty fast, and painting oneself into a corner is never pleasant.

Well isn’t this just a peachy piece of precedence? The non custodial father of a 18 year old girl, goes to jail because she fails to earn a GED while truant in moms custody.

Man Jailed After Daughter Fails To Get GED

A Fairfield man is in jail because his daughter hasn’t gotten her General Equivalency Diploma (GED).

A judge ordered the father to stay on top of his daughter’s education months ago and when that order wasn’t followed, Brian Gegner was sentenced to 180-days in the Butler County jail.

The daughter, Brittany Gegner, says her father shouldn’t be punished for her problems.

Especially, she says because she’s now 18, an adult.

"It’s ridiculously wrong," said Brittany Gegner.

"Of all the punishments they could have given him, to make him go to jail?," she asked. "I mean, probation – until I get my GED – would be reasonable, but to send him to jail? That’s overboard."

Butler County Juvenile Court Judge David Niehaus ordered Gegner to jail for contributing to the delinquency of a minor by not following a court order which required Gegner to be sure his daughter got her GED.

This comes after ongoing problems of Brittany skipping classes at Fairfield High School and then, Butler Tech.

While Brian Gegner had custody of her, Brittany says it was while she lived with her mother that she was truant.

"I’m about to be 19 and my Dad’s being punished for something I did when I was 16," she said.

"It’s like I should, if anybody should be punished for this," said Brittany. "I would way rather me go to jail than my Dad."

"They probably should have punished me if they were going to punish anybody," said Brittany’s mother Shana Roach. "Because she did live with me at the time, but because he had the custody, that’s why he’s being punished."

"But I don’t understand the punishment all together because she’s going to school, she’s been going for four months," said Roach. "The only thing that’s holding her back is she can’t pass her math test."

Brittany has a daughter who’s about 18-months-old.

She says she’s determined to pass the GED for her daughter – and her father.

The judge says if she passes the test, her father could get out of jail before his six-months sentence is up.

Brittany’s step-mother worries the time in jail will ruin their family.

She says he could lose the job he’s worked for 15-years.

"I never dreamed they would put him in jail for this – for six months – it’s crazy," said Stephanie Gegner, Brittany’s step-mother.

"He has no control over what his adult daughter does," she said. "He just doesn’t."

Court administrators say that even though Brittany is an adult now, the case remains active in their court because she was a juvenile when the problems started.

They say this type of punishment is rare and reserved for extreme cases when court orders aren’t met.

Sugar, Spice and everything nice, thats what little girls WERE made of.

Thats before Feminism defined a proper lady as a mini man of the worst character, and decided to change the recipe. Now good people are in short supply everywhere.

Thanks for making the world better ladies, because prior to your help, we actually believed that women were not capable of being so short sighted, selfish, mean, deadly, and horrific.

You’ve come a long way baby!

Gang of girls ‘blew up house with home-made bomb over row about boy’

A gang of teenage girls may have blown up a house with a home-made liquid bomb, which killed a man in a neighbouring property, after arguing with another girl about a love rival.

Purple liquid was poured through the letterbox of the Victorian house before the an explosion destroyed three houses.

Their intended victim, Charlotte Anderson, was caught in the blast and was rushed to intensive care suffering with severe burns.

Ten hours earlier Miss Anderson had phoned police to say a gang of girls aged 16 and 17 was causing trouble outside her home, in Harrow. They were directing abuse, about a boy, at Miss Anderson’s ground floor flat.

Witnesses said they saw someone pouring a "purple, smelly liquid" through the letterbox of the house.

Experts say the liquid could have vaporized and caused the explosion, which killed Emad Qureshi, 26, who was at home with his parents in a neighbouring house at the time of the blast.

He was crushed to death by falling rubble.

Miss Anderson was pulled from her wrecked flat by a neighbour and she was rushed to hospital, where her condition was described as "non life-threatening".

Scotland Yard launched a murder investigation and is hunting the girl gang.

A police source said the liquid could have been made using a "recipe" found on the internet

DCI Colin Sutton said: "Our major line of inquiry is that this liquid caused the explosion and that the explosion was an attempt to murder this young woman."

Police originally thought the devastating explosion had been caused by a gas leak, a theory which has now been played down.

DCI Sutton said: "We still haven’t ruled out a gas explosion but experts say it is unlikely to be the cause. What we can say is that we are happy there is no link to any terrorist organisation or acts here.

"A strong line of inquiry for us at the moment is the dispute, this call at the address and of course the substance that was put through the letterbox."

If women ruled the world there would be nothing but peace, no?

Here I am catching up on some outer news, moving from an article on the last survivor of the Titanic, to this odd thread about educational departments and teaching of the ills of communism.

Interesting piece actually. With a title that reads:
How persistent can a failed ideology be?

Arguing about whether or not to teach about the attrocities of communist/socialist regimes.

A click here and a click there, and the headline
Swedish feminists should embrace free markets

It was about this time that I checked to see if my world was still in color, and if I might be the subject of a new twilight zone episode.

This is from Swedish news in english, so its pretty darn interesting to see such capitalist trends, and see them directed at feminists who have generally thrown their hats in with the ideology covered in the first article.

It’s even more interesting when you read that they have determined the pay gap is gone, and we are still arguing about it.

A demographer at Queens College has recently reported that women of all educational levels within the age group 21-30 and working full time make 17 percent more in salary than the corresponding group of men. A similar situation is also found in Chicago, Boston and Minneapolis. In Dallas, the gap was 20 percent in favor of women.

however such logical gems as;

The lack of progress for feminism might be due to the strong influence of left wing ideology, which creates alienation. Many Swedish feminists readily mix Marxist ideas with the women’s cause.

Let me know that things are more normal than first blush would seem.

As does this little quote;

in a speech given at Lund University, one of the leading figures of Swedish feminism, Professor Tiina Ronsenberg is quoted as saying: “Do not be depressed – act. Sooner or later the patriarchy and capitalism will fall, I promise!”

The Twilight Zone feel is that the article was holding the facts up and calling it like it is. This is even more shocking when their suggestion is that being socialists just was the wrong side to be on. That not only do quotes like above turn people off, but just having the wrong people in your party can do it too.

Another example is that of Gudrun Schyman. The leading figure in the Swedish feminist party is also the former leader of the Swedish Left Party, which used to be tied to the Soviet Union. Understandably, feminist ideas become less relevant for public policy decisions when strongly tied to radical left wing ideology.

The irony is massive.

But is their analysis true to begin with — that capitalism as such is against the interests of women? One can make two simple observations that disprove this hypothesis. Firstly, all countries in the world with high standards of living standard have, in one way or another, adopted market economies. For example, a rapid development from poverty to wealth is occurring in China, Vietnam, India and Eastern Europe due to a transition from socialism to capitalism. This development is undeniably good for both men and women.

At this point is when they rack off how well american women (of whom many ardent feminists still think they are very oppressed) are doing compared to men (though failing to realize that if they are ahead they are not equal).

They also point out how well women are doing in Sweden.

In Sweden on the other hand, female entrepreneurship is particularly limited. When the Swedish Federation of Private Enterprises compared 25 European nations, they found that only Ireland and Malta had a higher ratio of male to female entrepreneurs than Sweden. Only 3.9 percent of Swedish women run their own businesses, compared to a 5.7 percent average in the 25 EU nations surveyed.

And much more bravely than here make the point;

Limited opportunities for female entrepreneurship in Sweden are strongly linked to welfare policies. Women tend to work in caring services, such as healthcare. These jobs typically fall within various state monopolies in Sweden where entrepreneurship is either not allowed or strictly limited.

Professional women are also hurt by the monopolies, since employment in the public sector is often characterized by low wages. This is the reason why American nurses, who often work in the private sector, have the same salaries as Swedish doctors, usually employed by the public sector. Jobs in the public sector are also associated with bad working conditions. In Sweden, half of those on long term sick leave are found within the public sector, which only employs a third of the workforce.

The bigger question is whether the news will reach america before america becomes more Swedish than the Swedes?

Creating the opportunities for young women to catch up with, or even surpass, young men requires that we open up public monopolies for entrepreneurship and competition. There is then a case to be made that free markets promote rather than hinder the cause of women. The Swedish feminist movement would gain in popularity and be better able to find constructive solutions if they replace traditional anti-capitalist sentiments with a more open-minded view of the role of free markets.

I guess now we can realize that for the past 40 years they have been reversing the engine and if they had succeeded (which they still might), they would have driven themselves into a ditch of low wages and stagnation.

I never thought I would see the day that I would read in a Swedish newspaper what amounts to “The mythical capitalist patriarchy was and is better to women than feminism, socialism, and communism”.

Anyone want to mention how many have been telling them so?

Taj!!

Reminds me of Hungary after Lukacks…

Not much to say that hasnt been said. No one is home REARING them, they are raising them like corn. The state is indoctrinating them, not teaching them. If a socialist system is a socipathic polity, you will realize that these kids get an A+. in fact, someone is going to sell us on how well they were taught to group think, plan and organize.

However, this takes telling Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite to a whole new level. Good thing there are few men in schools anymore, that way the blame can fall right where it belongs.

Cops: 3rd-Graders Plotted Teacher Attack
By RUSS BYNUM
WAYCROSS, Ga. (AP) — A group of children ages 8 to 10 apparently were mad at their teacher because she had scolded one of them for standing on a chair, authorities say.

That led the third-graders, as many as nine boys and girls, to plot an attack on the teacher at Center Elementary School in south Georgia.

Police Chief Tony Tanner said the students apparently planned to knock the teacher unconscious with a glass paperweight, bind her with handcuffs and duct tape and then stab her with a broken steak knife.

The scheme involved a division of roles, Tanner said. One child’s job was to cover windows so no one could see outside, and another was supposed to clean up after the attack.

“We’re not sure at this point in the investigation how many of the students actually knew the intent was to hurt the teacher,” Tanner said.

School officials had alerted police Friday after a pupil tipped off a teacher that a girl had taken a weapon to school.

Tanner said the teacher told detectives the children weren’t known as troublemakers.

“You can’t dismiss it,” Tanner said. “But because they are kids, they may have thought this was like a cartoon — we do whatever and then she stands up and she’s OK. That’s a hard call.”

The purported target teaches third-grade students with learning disabilities, including attention deficit disorder, delayed development and hyperactivity, friends and parents said.

Two of the students were arrested on juvenile charges Tuesday and a third arrest was expected. District Attorney Rick Currie said other students told investigators they didn’t take the plot seriously or insisted they had decided not to participate.

“Some of the kids said, `We thought they were just kidding,’” Currie said. “Another child was supposed to bring a toy pistol, and he told a detective he didn’t bring it because he thought he would get in trouble.”

Currie said the children are too young to be charged as adults, and probably too young to be sentenced to a youth detention center.

“We did not hear anybody say they intended to kill her, but could they have accidentally killed her? Absolutely,” Tanner said. “We feel like if they weren’t interrupted, there would have been an attempt. Would they have been successful? We don’t know.”

Currie said he decided to seek juvenile charges against two girls, ages 9 and 10, who brought the knife and paperweight and an 8-year-old boy who brought tape. He said they face charges of conspiracy to commit aggravated assault, and both girls are being charged with taking weapons to school.

Nine children have been given discipline up to and including long-term suspension, said Theresa Martin, spokeswoman for the Ware County school system. She would not be more specific but said none of the children had been back to school since the case came to light.

School system policy says any student who brings “anything reasonably considered to be a weapon” is to be expelled for at least the remainder of the school year.

There’s an interesting video that I’d like for you all to see, But for some crazy reason, Blogwonks won’t let me embed it here.

So, you’ll have to come to my blog.

Click here to see what Democratic Socialism gets you, in this day and age in America.

…..the scary part is, we’re putting one of those…..in the White House.

Here are our candidates:

Feb. 13 - ‘Mistress Day’ - marks day of straying for men

or

If you think your guy has never been with a prostitute, think again

Who said Hegel was dull?

The second article, has such lovely logical scientific gems like this:

A 2007 survey found that one in five men in the U.K. has enlisted the services of a sex worker, so it isn’t a stretch to think your guy may have doled out some dollars for the deed.

If your lady has BPD, or is paranoid, I urge you to not let her read this article. She probably isnt the type to realize that 4 out of 5 have NOT enlisted the services of a sex worker while living in a country where the sex business is a lot more legal than in the US, and which is far across the ocean and still has a monarch that isnt a butterfly.

Some women will read this “But if you aren’t asking them, they aren’t telling. “, decide to ask, and in my fair city of eight million or so, there will be a significant number of groans.

Right now if I open my window, and listen quietly I won’t hear “I’m mad as hell and I am not going to take it anymore”. I will hear “What happened to asking me if your butt was fat? Can we go back to that question?”.

Interesting as it is, it sounds like one long made up piece, while another article (not in the lineup here or online), pointed out that most men who saw expensive prostitutes wanted a great date, and that she found that a bit sad.

Given that the sex worker had a totally different take than the MSM PC message, and this article is just a collection of made up vignettes that sound like a womans magazine confessional article sold as news. It even reads like make up ad copy, or a sex in the city promo.

The men of Manhattan sleep with prostitutes for any number of reasons: variety, getting something they can’t get at home, or just the sheer thrill of it.

David is a good-looking guy. He comes in at a little under 6 feet. Brown hair, brown eyes, good dresser. He owns his apartment downtown, has an Ivy League degree and a Hamptons summer share…

There is even a second liberating message for men peeking in on this message

I’m a preppy guy. I could never take home a girl who was all edgy. She would take one look and laugh at me. I can break out of my mold with a prostitute.

Hey, nothing like a prostitute to break you out of your persona and let your hair down (if you have long hair).
They even include a worry bomb.

Psychologist and relationship expert Cooper Lawrence says the nicer the girlfriend, the more likely the guy might seek sex outside the relationship.

So hurry up and stop being nice, that will make things better. We all know that complaining, and generally not nice women have better relationships that lead to their men preferring to stay home and not seek outside the relationship.

“The happier and the nicer the girl is they are with, the more likely they will go to a prostitute if they are into some odd sexual proclivity, because you aren’t going to ask the mother of your children to spank you or even to talk dirty to you,” Lawrence says.

Whatever happend to imagination and hairy hands?

Very contrary to the other article with interviews, the interview answer here can be imagined from a scene in a comedy. contrast this erudite answer with the call girls answer that they want a great date and sex isnt the focus.
(which makes sense if your not silly enough to think that for that price sex was the focus)

“Men just need the variety. They’re like jack rabbits, but most men don’t want to have a full-blown affair and mess with their marriage,” Quan explains. “They aren’t bad guys. They just can’t control their urges.

So in the name of Variety, let us move on to contestant number two.

Feb. 13 - ‘Mistress Day’ - marks day of straying for men

Another fine title for a new addition to the male calender of perfidy. Has anyone noticed but with all these theories, they seem to add calander dates to them. Kind of like men look at their day planner to figure out what nefarious thing they should do today. Let’s see, superbowl sunday, remember to beat the wife. Valentines, remember you beat the wife and give her a gift. And day after Valentines, placate the hooker or mistress in your life.

Unofficially, Feb. 13 is also known as “Mistress Day,” the day that straying boyfriends and husbands set aside for the “other woman” - since they’re spending the actual Valentine’s Day with their girlfriends and wives.

Given the recent leftist true stories in literary form (and then withdrawn), they actually believe that we would believe that men live like mobsters in a living version of “Goodfella’s”.

Just like the other article it has a lot of semi precious kidney stones.

“It might not be a nationally celebrated day, but it’s at least a day to practice your ‘mistress retention’ skills,”

I am glad they cleared up that its not nationally celebrated. Let me guess, Indian reservations ignore the holiday. But the article is sure to point out that businesses know the low down, on down low.

The city’s dining industry caters to Mistress Day’s unfaithful crowd. “I guess probably in 10 years Hallmark will make a card for it,”

Every year customers at cozy One If by Land, Two If by Sea make two reservations during Valentine’s week - and ask the staff to pretend that they didn’t see them the first time around.

City florists see their fair share of infidelity, as well. “There are a lot of men out there who do that,” agrees one manager

It’s a city wide epidemic!

Naturally, then, the days surrounding Feb. 13 are the best times to pin down a philanderer. “You’ve got a three-day window where anyone who’s cheating will more than likely be making contact with the person they’re cheating with,”

So mark your calender because they didnt have this idea for propaganda last month, and could only think of using the Spitzer incident to promote what they could this month.

So which is it, which headline is worse?

Its interesting that the average person thinks themselves and those around them are potential targets to the point that anything they see that fits some odd notion of a bomb (that is more like television or spy vs. spy, than real life), causes them to make a call.

Sex Toy Triggers Bomb Scare In Sweden
Vibrating Sex Toy Triggers Bomb Scare In Garage Of Building In Sweden
(AP) A Swedish bomb squad called out to disarm a suspicious package on Wednesday did not find a ticking bomb. But they did find a vibrating sex toy.

A janitor alerted police after he found the package in a garage of an apartment building in Goteborg, the country’s second-largest city, police spokesman Jan Strannegard said.

The package was humming and vibrating suspiciously, so police took no chances and sent out a team of explosives experts. After having cordoned off the area, they opened the package with bomb disposal equipment, only to find the battery-operated device inside.

“The package was vibrating when the janitor found it, but I think it had sort of died out by the time it was disarmed,” Strannegard said.

Similar irrationalities have prevailed in the west. A cartoon character giving the finger as an ad campaign ended up paralyzing Boston. Small towns in the Midwest that would be hard to find if one intended to go there, get terrorist funds as if Podunk is really the center of the targeting list.

I ask people… Do bomb makers really really make their bombs noisy and oddly conspicuous? Is it really a valid marker that they let wires hang out and use a big alarm clock like in the cartoons? The closest thing to this is their use in Iraq of a cheap clock that gives a prayer when striking…

As funny as all this sounds, it has serious consequences. After all, wasn’t it an innocent person that was chased down into the subway and had bullets put into his head to stop him the fastest. The excuse is that by doing so they prevented him from being able to set off a device. However, anyone that has seen “The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3” or “Speed 2”, knows about dead mans triggers, where if you stop them, they let go, and you get the result that you were trying to prevent. Like cutting the red wire or the blue wire, it’s a gamble which one… meanwhile, it’s easy to construct circuits that trigger if you dismantle or disturb them. One only needs to read the case history of the Unabomber Ted Kaczynski.

This is also a canary in a coal mine as to the intelligence of our population. In the past admonitions to notice things could lead to good tips. Today, people have so few principals and truths as to how things work, and so forth, that most calls are fantasies that waste resources and worse ratchet up the fear level and doing the job of the terrorists for them.

Our population is so naïve that they can’t conceive of how they could be hurt or effected by things in any realistic way. This also causes the responses to such things to be out of proportion. Take for instance searching people in the airports, and spending money on huge machines to do it.

Such a thing would only work if the people wishing to beat the system had no brains and behaved much as a children’s toy that walks into walls and turns and walks away till it hits another wall. You change something, they change in response. Lots of targets are exposed and even a inept planner, as the beltway sniper showed, can cause problems. One only needs to tune into the cable interest channels to see what’s available.

How does having a multibillion dollar sniffing machine help that? It doesn’t, but what it does do is burden the people, which is the point of the whole exercise (from the position of the terrorists – make burdens till they comply). Terrorism is a tactic that is like taxing the people till the efficiency runs out and the machine grinds to a halt (it creates self imposed attrition beyond that which the enemy could ever do otherwise with such small resources). One attack, and our inability to react in a meaningful way that makes sense has led us to spend literally billions that do pretty much nothing to really make us safer (but do a whole lot to help the left hobble our system and exploit that to add more millstones). Which is why this form of conflict is now favored (among some other newbies). The trade center proved that only a few people are needed to cause a trillion dollars in damage since we are so willing to help them once they start, and we then finish it, not only dumping money, but dumping our way of life and our freedoms in exchange for a safety that is not possible (at least the way that we react guarantees that).

How long till the monetary hit, that doesn’t lead to productivity, causes things to be so difficult that we can’t do what we need to do? Anyone read about the problem now in science? Now scientists have to leave the US and meet in other places, because the others can’t come here. So how much does that change the cost factor in productivity? How much will that change the dynamic of innovation? How much are we letting it voluntarily?

Take things like Woolworths building in NY. They no longer let tourists inside to see the beautiful stain glass ceilings and such. Why? Because they are so self aggrandized that think that they are a potential target. As if Woolworth which doesn’t exist anymore is still some form of meaningful icon the world would know and understand (rather than an earlier precursor to the dollar stores that dot the urban landscape).

Meanwhile tourists are being harassed and such over things like taking pictures on public streets where building owners and such have guards run out and order them to desist. The tourists are afraid that they are in trouble, and the guards have no right to do that. Meanwhile a person quietly sitting there with a pad and paper is left alone. Not that they should expand their wrong headedness, but to illustrate how wrong headed they are at all. Ever visit someone and then draw a map a few weeks later, for someone else on how to get there? Then access is the only thing that matters, not the cameras, the paper, the phones, the laptops. One can’t erase the memory of a person who walks around, and one cant stop access in public areas unless they lock people in their homes and hotels.

Watching tourists take pictures and focusing on the hardware prevents the guards and others from looking for behaviors that would show serious meaning. Like a person who goes someplace, stands, then paces to the other side of the area, measuring it (watch old John Wayne movies for hints for what to look for).

The subway system is known all over the world, has lots of cool things for tourists. Murals, sculptures, performers, and so forth… but if you take a picture, and your not using a point and shoot, you’re a potential terrorist and they give you a hard time… this comes from the theory that a terrorist would go out and buy a $5000 dollar camera (after all, they get the best), and lenses to take pictures so conspicuously that everyone stares at them while they walk around. This means that a terrorist with a pinhole camera can go anywhere.

Does anyone other than me see that such responses are a form of mass hysteria? That they cause people to be afraid of what was yesterday innocuous? And technically is still innocuous.

Right now people are spending thousands of dollars to remove bright signs that are like sore thumbs and disarming sex toys, as they are really really dangerous things. But no one is stopping the [self censored] test tube of [self censored], the [self censored] on the piece of paper for the [self censored]. The man, or woman, who [self censored] an hour before boarding.

Ultimately when the time comes, and hopefully it will never get to that, such uneven reactions with no ability to apply real information to will make it easy to cause pandemonium. They don’t even really need real things at that point. A stampede is easy to cause if this is how people think. Even worse, many of the programs like putting police to search passengers at random entering the subways like the Nazi Gestapo did, doesn’t accomplish anything other than getting the public used to such measures of technically unconstitutional actions. Randomizing the action doesn’t make it “ok”. What such means of prevention does do is show how far away and how far out of touch our leadership is if they think that someone can’t enter a subway first to see if anyone is there.

We are lucky, not just Sweden. We are lucky that for the most part the tactics are not effective to get what they want, and so they are not employed anywhere near what they could be. Today its funny, but what that does is do for situations in that we cry wolf till we no longer care, and then what?

Well, one thing you can say for some throughout history… “At least their consistent”.

Today Time Magazine has once again decided to walk in its prior footsteps….

What do i mean? Easy, I mean that Person of the Year has been selected, and the award goes to Putin!

So what does that have to do with Adolf Hitler, and Joseph Stalin?

Well Hitler won the title in 1938, just before he and Stalin got together (Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact / Nazi-Soviet Pact / Stalin Pact / German-Soviet Non-aggression Pact), to take over Europe and share the spoils…

Comrade Stalin also won the same award… about the time that Hitler double crossed his ‘friend’ and proceeded to renege on the deal and take all of Europe and Russia, and the Middle East, and Africa, and…

And now? Well time has seen fit to select Putin. Though he wasn’t up against much competition… according to the article, it was either that, Gore, or JL Rowling.

The Time piece does point out prior winners of their award (Bono being one example), but neglected to list other heroes of socialism that they thought were just peachy too.

I wonder why?

Could it be that these heroes, whose combined excursions and policies resulted in the death and torture of literally millions of people with numbers exceeding 40 million with ease, may have been a bad choice?

Well one thing is certain, Time magazine has managed to pull the cover images from the articles they have had them openly displayed on for years and freely available.

Oh… don’t forget that they have also awarded Deng Xiaoping in 1986

And I will leave it to you to also check out all the others… like Che Guevara making the cover aug 8 1960, with Mao, and Khrushchev in the background. Though not a man of the year cover, he didn’t live long enough. Though Castro made it nine times to the cover, never made man of the year, but he is still in office so maybe next year if they don’t pick Chavez.

As George Santayana said, “Those who refuse to learn from history are condemned to repeat it.”

The Time article on Putin can be found here under “A Tsar is Born!!!”

brought to you by venome, spew, and hatred… (why blame an individual when you can blame the group as if the whole group is like the few?) - click here

Delusional twit… she doesnt see her own behavior illustrates the case against her own delusion… however if you read carefully in the first paragraph, she explains that she only has half a brain…

the emphasis in the post is mine…

I hate men. Yes, I am a feminist. No, not all feminists hate men. But at this point in my life I have begun to wonder why any woman with half a brain would NOT hate men. It is perhaps testament to the amazing moral superiority of women that most women do not hate men in spite of the tortures men inflict upon them, their children, and each other. Or perhaps it is a reason why feminism has not succeeded. Perhaps in order for women to stop being chattel under the bootheels of cruel, stupid men, they will have to learn to hate men at least a little.

This journal will consist of a list of good reasons to hate men.

I will grant the naysayers this - that the actions which make men, as a class, hateable, are not engaged in or supported, even passively, by all men. In other words, there are probably a few good men out there, who really do not condone in any way, shape or form, any of the following:

Rape
Murder
War
Environmental destruction for the sake of “jobs”
Wife beating
Girlfriend beating
Porn
BDSM
Street harassment of women
Forced veiling of women
Incest
Statutory rape
Forced pregnancy and birth
Giving fetii more rights than the women in whose bodies they are growing

But I haven’t personally met any. I’ve heard of a precious few via their writings in print and online. Less than ten. Out of thousands of men I have met in my life, I can count the “good” ones on one hand. And what I listed above as a description of “good” is, for me, not even “good” but just “not bad”, as in “not evil and unempathetic”.

Every man I have had personal interactions with supports at least 2-3 of the above things, or engages in them.

Every single one.

That is, in and of itself, enough to make any sensible woman want to run away to join an Amazonian cult. Alas, I am not able to do so. But I can bitch about how much I hate men on LJ.

And you know, for a start, maybe that’s enough. Men have such fragile and pathetic little egos that even though they enjoy almost complete and total world domination, they are awfully threatened by women speaking up for themselves even a little bit. This is why even the most timid feminist woman saying “perhaps maybe you guys should look at this particular instance of gross mistreatment of women and realize that it isn’t in the spirit of fair play” will get buried under a mountain of hate mail from offended penis owners who insist she must be a man-hater because she isn’t begging to suck their ugly cocks in overawed gratitude for their gracious gift of allowing her to continue breathing. So I can imagine how they will look at this journal.

So in order to piss them off even more, their comments will not be allowed to appear here. This is a no males zone.

Only friends may comment here and no male person shall be friended, nor shall any female apologist for males. Transwomen I shall consider female and allow to post here under the same rules an non-transwomen - if they will not speak up in defense of males. No female bashing is allowed here. No male praising is allowed here. That you can get a plenty in every other sector of the world.

This is a female safe zone, a feminist safe zone, a girl and woman and transwoman safe zone, a place where males will get the verbal bashing they deserve. If you BOYS don’t like it, you don’t have to read it. If you get a mental wedgie from reading it, that’s your own fucking problem.

But perhaps hate is not the correct word in the end. To paraphrase one of that tiny number of men I repsect for not being a total shit, “Hate is not an emotion, hate is behavior.” I have extreme dislike towards men, but I do not: beat them; rape them; kill them; stalk them; take away their civil liberties; agitate for laws to be passed that impede upon their reproductive choices; advocate that they be raped for misbehaving; or any of the tortures inflicted upon women so often they no don’t even make the back page of the newspaper unless the crime has some particular sensationalistic value. A lot is said about how women who stand up for themselves hate men. Very little is said about the obvious and ubiquitous hatred of most men for women.

Well, I’ll have a lot to say about it here.

is it any wonder that she has no decent men in her life? any decent guy would run away, far away, for a long long time… bout the only ones that would deal with such a person are predators… so her own behavior skews the world around her, and she thinks that its representitive of the mass and the norm.

guess what? i will bet that most women, knwo more than ten men that are decent… and in fact, most women cant name ten men that are horrible…

i cant name one that would approve of her list of things… so i am wondering where the heck does this sad little person live to have met so many? generally, they havent met much of any… the feminists that i have met that mostly talk like this, are dworkinesque… ie. gargoyles, and their hatred stems from no one liking them…

after all… with this person, whats not to like?