Unfortunately, some conservative women know what it's like to be a black Republican. Liberals publicly fantasize about our deaths and the "hate fuck" or rape of the women. Besides the obvious, this is a very instructive incident.
First of all, Playboy thought this would be great publicity and sent out emails alerting the blogs about this insightful piece of commentary…
Subject line: So Right It’s Wrong
Hello —
I just wanted to pass on the link to “So Right It’s Wrong,” an article on the top 10 conservative women we hate to love. It just went live on our site this morning.
http://www.playboy.com/articles/playboy-forum-the-top-10-women-conservatism/index.htmlBest Regards,
Aranya Tomseth
Editor | Online Community Manager
Playboy.com
Of course, after the unexpected condemnations came in, Playboy scrubbed the page from the Internet, or at least they tried to.
Secondly, for some strange reason Politico's Anne Schroeder Mullins didn't see much of an issue and almost apologized, not for Guy Cimbalo's poor choice of sentiment, but that the tightly-wound got all worked up in the first place.
Since Playboy was so pussified as to removing the offending piece, "The Top 10 Conservative Women We’d Like To Filibuster", please allow me to share with you Mr. Cimbalo's musings…
Obama promised us the dream of post-partisanship—a cuckoo land where party affiliation and factional animosity were forgotten. Turn on cable news or open any newspaper, however, and you’ll quickly discover that the dream has yet to materialize. But there is a way to reach across the aisle without letting principles fall by the wayside. We speak, naturally, of the hate fuck. We may despise everything these women represent, but goddammit they’re hot. Let the healing begin.
.
Now, I try to be very careful when commenting on the personal appearance of others, but rape may be the only way this Guido-lookin' Guy Cimbalo can get any. Obviously liberal women aren't knocking down his door so he needed to lash out at what he deems unattainable.
The fact that he felt comfortable writing this shows that there is clearly a double standard. If ANYONE, let alone a conservative, had written about liberal women worthy of being raped, that person would be lucky if he'd ever be able to show his face in public again. The media would be running leads on this, and ACORN would be sending bus tours to picket his home.
But notice how little you've heard about this?
That's because conservatives, in the liberal mind, should be raped or worse. Sarah Palin can be hanged in effigy with nary a word from feminist organizations (NOW commented only after being contacted by Hasselbeck). A Top 10 list of potential rape victims can be created by a Playboy writer, and still silence from the liberals.
Do we now see whom we're dealing with?














.
Great presentation! Just imagine the justified ‘Liberal’ outrage if say, ‘Hustler’ Magazine ran a disgusting parody where Rush, Hannity, Beck, Savage and Ann Coulter gang-raped and tickle-tortured Katie Couric, and then Nancy Pelosi.
Imagine. The outrage would last for months in the MSM. There would be calls for firings and boycotts. NOW would be apoplectic. Poor little outraged, hypocritical Libs.
absurd thought –
God of the Universe says
joke about raping women
if they are conservative
EVIL freedom lovers…
.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
always rape women…
who are conservative
they’re just gender traitors
.
If you're bothered by this list, that's fine. But don't make it into something it's not. He NEVER wrote, nor implied the advocacy of RAPING WOMEN. He never wrote of violence. He never wrote of any type of forceful or dominating activity. If you read his intro to the piece, it's clear that the term 'hate fuck' just means to enjoy having sex with someone despite the fact that you may hate them. I'm quite sure most rapists don't actually hate the women they rape. In fact, many rapists are obsessed with the woman, not hateful.
My ex-girlfriend and i used to hate fuck EACH OTHER, and it was the best sex we ever had. That's right. GIRLS can hate fuck, too.
In any case, maybe the article was wrong, maybe it wasn't. But if you're going to slam the guy, at least slam him for something he DID write, not something he didn't.
Much ado about nothing. Why do radicals always focus on things done or said by idiots? This guy isn’t running anything. He has no real power, just the ability to add to the vast wastland called the internet. Be the writer a liberal or conservative, the point is mute, nonsense. Call a spade a spade and speak of it no more.