Alright, this is pretty reminiscent of the kind of propaganda we see coming from totalitarian states. Is this the shape of things to come during an Obama administration?
Plus, the song really, really sucks okay? Interestingly enough though, while the video is supposed to be a homemade production, it turns out that it was produced by some media bigwigs like Jeff Zucker, the head of NBC Universal. Why am I not surprised? And, how stupid do these people think we are? Did they really think we wouldn’t find out about this?
Update (10/1 9:00 AM)
It looks like the creepy Obama video has now been pulled due to all the bashing it has attracted.
Has been pulled from YouTube. From a reader:
No big surprise there, I knew it wouldn’t last after Hannity played it on his show tonight and Rush this on his show, the last I looked it had received close to 400,000 views. Its to bad the country needed to see this, did anyone tape this so that i can e re posted or is that a copyright problem..
Hopefully some bloggers have copies so they can keep showing it.
Update (10/1 11:04 AM)
There’s still a copy of the video right here. Watch and enjoy.




[...] GroupThink Mindthoughts Song. Painful to listen to, and gut-wrenching in its implications. Incredibly creepy. Compare and contrast with North Korean Children Singing to Dear [...]
Obama is turning out to be The Big Let-Down of ’08.
Obama kept insinuating that He is The Second Coming but every time we’ve held our breaths waiting for him to change water into wine, we’ve been disappointed. Obama kept telling us to ‘tune in next week!’ and he never delivers, the miracle never comes. There is nothing there.
Obama’s has a problem with clarity. I have systematically studied both his autobiographies and I still don’t know what kind of man I’m dealing with. When he was first showcased on TV, my interest was aroused. I used to find Obama enigmatic, but now he just comes off as vacuous, empty.
Obama’s two books address the questions of “Journey of Discovery to Where?” and “Who Am I?” We can all relate to such pondering. But Obama does not give us an answer. If he has found the answer since publishing those two books two years ago then he hasn’t told us yet.
McCain has been on a longer and harder personal journey. There can be nothing more extreme than surviving daily torture for five years. Can you imagine that? To be beaten day-in and day-out, starved, your hands and legs bound by chains? McCain already knows what he can take, and humbly knows where he breaks. Every man and woman has a breaking point. It is very human. McCain already knows his, even though he held out as long as he could.
What trials or stories of human devastation has Obama endured? I can’t imagine being Black in America is an easy thing. But Obama was raised in Polynesia by white grandparents and then went on to Harvard, community service, the Senate, and now the presidency. Obama’s journey seems to have been very easy. His skin color opened all the right doors for him instead of slamming them shut. Obama didn’t march against segregation. Obama didn’t fight for affirmative action. He planted no tree. He carried no water for that tree. Obama has just come along and picked the fruits. That is easy street. This is not a great American story. This is not a triumph of will over adversity. This is a story of baby-boomer entitlement. This is the story of the yuppy next door. These stories are a dime a dozen on aisle 3 at Whole Foods.
You may agree or disagree with McCain but at least you know where he stands. He has a long track record to judge him by. McCain has a long list of hits and misses. He has made mistakes (like us all) but that is because he had been trying to do things and change things all his life. Obama markets himself as the candidate with an unblemished record, but that is only because he doesn’t have a record. We have nothing to judge Obama by. All he gives us is his word and we are supposed to put all our trust in his future promises. But these promises keep changing: Obama has produced two contradictory promises on Iraq, two contradictory promises on NAFTA, and two contradictory promises on taxes. Are we supposed to judge him by the original promise he made, or by his most recent one? The candidate who flows with the changing winds of polls is the lightweight. That much we know.
I feel very embarrassed for buying into the Obama phenomena. Maybe now that the weather is changing I see things in a new light. I feel sheepish for falling for the marketing pitch. Where do I go to get a refund?
I think that many voters like me are looking for clarity in our next president. I feel I know what kind of man McCain is, and that I can trust him. McCain gets my vote.
Well, Obama is completely empty as far as the way he campaigns. He says he’s a mirror in which people see what they want to see. His whole campaign strategy was to not really say much of anything, hoping that people hated Bush so much, and that he’d be able to trick people into believing McCain was another Bush, that Obama would be able to win without having to say anything.
Obviously it’s not working that well since all Obama has been able to solidly nail down is his base. The big problem is Obama does have a history that people are learning about. He’s a Marxist, his parents were Marxists, their friends were Marxists.
He went to a radical church for 20 years when it suited him and left the church when people found out about it. He’s friends with, and got his politcal career started by Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, two terrorists who have never apologized for the fact that they murdered people and blew up buildings. He has an incredibly radical abortion stance, even believing that infants born alive after failed abortions can be killed legally.
He bought his home in Chicago with the help of a mobster Tony Rezko who was also an Obama fundraiser. He won election in Chicago by having his opponents all thrown off the ballot. He won election to the Senate when his campaign dug into his opponent’s divorce records and found out some ugly stuff about him. Obama is an ultra-liberal sleazy Chicago machine politician, no more no less. There’s just no compelling reason for anyone who’s not a purely partisan Democratic voter to vote for him.