I have already written quite a bit about various ways in which Barack Obama and the Democratic Party are responsible for the financial crisis which is now causing turmoil all over the globe. Today, Kevin Hassett at Bloomberg explains exactly why this financial meltdown is the fault of the Democrats.
The financial crisis of the past year has provided a number of surprising twists and turns, and from Bear Stearns Cos. to American International Group Inc., ambiguity has been a big part of the story.
Why did Bear Stearns fail, and how does that relate to AIG? It all seems so complex.
But really, it isn’t. Enough cards on this table have been turned over that the story is now clear. The economic history books will describe this episode in simple and understandable terms: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac exploded, and many bystanders were injured in the blast, some fatally.
Fannie and Freddie did this by becoming a key enabler of the mortgage crisis. They fueled Wall Street’s efforts to securitize subprime loans by becoming the primary customer of all AAA-rated subprime-mortgage pools. In addition, they held an enormous portfolio of mortgages themselves.
In the times that Fannie and Freddie couldn’t make the market, they became the market. Over the years, it added up to an enormous obligation. As of last June, Fannie alone owned or guaranteed more than $388 billion in high-risk mortgage investments. Their large presence created an environment within which even mortgage-backed securities assembled by others could find a ready home.
The problem was that the trillions of dollars in play were only low-risk investments if real estate prices continued to rise. Once they began to fall, the entire house of cards came down with them.
[...]
What happened next was extraordinary. For the first time in history, a serious Fannie and Freddie reform bill was passed by the Senate Banking Committee. The bill gave a regulator power to crack down, and would have required the companies to eliminate their investments in risky assets.
If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, a blizzard of terrible mortgage paper fluttered out of the Fannie and Freddie clouds, burying many of our oldest and most venerable institutions. Without their checkbooks keeping the market liquid and buying up excess supply, the market would likely have not existed.
But the bill didn’t become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic opposition, couldn’t even get the Senate to vote on the matter.(emphasis mine)
[...]
Now that the collapse has occurred, the roadblock built by Senate Democrats in 2005 is unforgivable. Many who opposed the bill doubtlessly did so for honorable reasons. Fannie and Freddie provided mounds of materials defending their practices. Perhaps some found their propaganda convincing.
But we now know that many of the senators who protected Fannie and Freddie, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd, have received mind-boggling levels of financial support from them over the years.
Throughout his political career, Obama has gotten more than $125,000 in campaign contributions from employees and political action committees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, second only to Dodd, the Senate Banking Committee chairman, who received more than $165,000.
Read the whole thing if you really want to understand what’s going on in the markets today, and how the Democrats are responsible. Then e-mail it to all your friends and family so they get the picture as well.
Related posts:
- Obama did nothing to stop Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac collapse I have written about this numerous times already, but it...
- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac face federal jury Well it’s about time, since this whole financial crisis we’re...
- Democrats wrongly claim no problems at Fannie Mae in 2004 You have to watch this video in which prominent Democrats...
- Burning Down the House-What Caused Our Economic Crisis? That’s the title of an excellent and concise video explaining...
- Race based social engineering is what’s causing this financial crisis I’ve written before about how The Community Reinvestment Act is...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
No Responses
They gave to the needs of the poor unqualified mortgagees and also to their own needs for the wealth they deserved. Each according to their need. How could Dodd, Obama, Clinton, or Barney act against those who shared their ideals?
Posted on September 22nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Any chance of getting a list of who and who didn’t vote on that?
Posted on September 25th, 2008 at 12:37 pm
An interesting rebuttal here:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/24/142623/808/348/608853
I’m not sure who to believe, it’s hard to get a clear picture on these kinds of things.
Posted on September 25th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Rick,
The bill was voted out of committee on a strict party line vote with every Democrat voting no, and every Republican voting yes. The bill never went to the full Senate for a vote. I’m sure there’s a way to look up the members of the Senate Banking Committee in 2006. I’ll see if I can figure it out.
Posted on September 25th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
Here’s the link for the members of the committee:
http://www.opensecrets.org/cmteprofiles/profiles.php?cmteid=S06&cmte=SBAN&congno=109
Posted on September 25th, 2008 at 4:16 pm
[...] written numerous times about how the Democrats are very much responsible for the subprime housing bubble and the ensuing financial ca…we’re presently suffering through. All of this is further proof of that reality. The sad thing [...]
Posted on January 5th, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Add A Comment