Turns out the rumors from the Nice Guys are correct…
When left on their own, without family and friends to help, women select mental people for mates because they find them sexy. That in the absence of the restriction of sex (which i am making no suggestions either way), that such overwhelming selection drowns out common sense. As long as short term sex and gratification are on the table, wasting time getting to know them, respecting them, and selecting a commpanion based on their caracter and values goes right out the window. Not because there arent guys that want to do that, but because the guys that do that lose, and the guys that treat them badly win.
No one wants to be a Loser, and with the modern woman, being a Loser (from the past) makes you a winner (in the present)!
That in the absence of chapperones, and such, womens choices tend towards selecting mates that would send us back to the trees and a dog eat dog way of life.
It doesnt take long for the guys to figure out what works, and so the women define the kind of pool that they can select from as the guys tailor themselves to whats effective. The ones in the pool define what the women have to do to get their attention since they are what the women want.
In the old days, it was bat an eye, drop a hankerchief, and be feminine for a decent man, giving no truck to the bad ones. Bring someone with you so that both are in control. Take time to get to know one another, discuss things, and keep the sex monster at bay. After all, we want to have sex with more people we see than the people we know. Getting to know someone first gives you pause to avoid bad outcomes. Listening to your family who are watching him as he is with you is also important in the past. After all, who will look out for you better than your parents? By the results of the studies, it isnt the self.
Today, the rules say you dont give truck to the boring nice guys, and so you have to compete for the bad boys who basically wouldnt notice a decent girl that batted her eyes and wanted a long courtship. Though they do pay attention to coquettes, pole dancers, girls in fetish wear, and women that can pull a train.
Of course the more moderate feminists cant understand what went wrong, and try to blame the men. These studies show that the men are just trying to be what the women want (not what they say they want).
So its a race to the bottom as they try to impress people with antisocial personality disorders who would make them jump through perverse hoops to prove how easy they are.
NEW research has revealed that "bad boys" who are cursed with anti-social personality traits are more successful with the opposite sex than "nice guys".
This week’s New Scientist says two studies in the US have found that men with "dark" characters - such as Hollywood hunk Colin Farrell - have the most prolific sex lives.
The so-called "dark triad" traits include impulsiveness, narcissism, thrill-seeking and deceitfulness, it said.
One of the studies, a survey of 35,000 people in 57 countries, found a clear link between dark triad traits and the reproductive success of males.
"It is universal across cultures for high dark triad scorers to be more active in short-term mating," David Schmitt, of Bradley University in the United States, told the New Scientist.
"They are more likely to try and poach other people’s partners for a brief affair."
Another study found that males who scored higher in the dark triad personality traits had a greater number of partners and a desire for short relationships.
Wow, who knew? (the guys who tried to tell them)
Of course the nice guys tend now to become copies of these bad boys because they dont want to be dealt out of the game of life. so this means that there is a much smaller amount of men willing to not use women and dump them, and there is a market for people to educate nice guys on how to become the crumbs and abusive people that women select (but say they dont want).
Way to go feminism..
You not only led sheep to the wolves, but made it customary for them to seek them out and lie down with them, all the while removing all the protections of the people that cared for them.
Utimately the genetics of the situation will lead to a vast increase of this kind of man in the population (more women have sex with more sociopaths, and antisocial personality disorders and what do you get as your future posterity?). The effect will not be the production of the new sensitive man that can be with women and be partners in life as before feminism, no, it will be the antisocial prison thug type who will use and discard her.
As soon as our society had enough nice guys, the ladies told them that they dont want them. Then went out and created a society that would destroy and remove the nice guys that were willing to live the way that we all thought was better (without having to destroy the family). One only needs to look at the painting "Sunday in the park" by George Seurat and compare that to the new art we create today, and you can see where their boat ride has taken us to.
In this case the old cultural maxims are so true:
You lay down with dogs, you get up with flees
You dont know what you had till its gone
One shouldnt throw the baby out with the bath water.
This kind of list could get real long. Though it would fall on empty ears today.
Women in the safe life created by men called society, which is much safer than before, find misery too exciting for them to want the nice guys. Its as if they are asking for the sword to fall because they can’t stant the tension of it hanging there. They tend to want men who want many women unlike the nice guys. they tend to like men that will not work and leech off of them. They tend to like men who are violent to them.
Face it nice guys, we cant compete, and maybe we shouldn’t?
After all, there is a huge number of foreign women who have not yet decided to be miserable, and given the outcomes of the past 40 years in the west, the problem ultimatly will fix itself demographically one way or another.
Add A Comment