BlogWonks

Going through my morning mail i get a reference to an interesting article at the UK Mail Femail section…

It appears to be a bit of a dose of reality.

The first article tries to explain:

Why more and more women are losing custody battles over their children

One could call this an expectations expose…   The main gist not discussed but oozing through the cracks was:

I did what they said would be great, so how come I don’t have my kids since I worked.

to which the obvious answer to those who understand the far left leaders of the radical feminists…

It means that they were set up, not knowing the game was that they were to be damned if they do, damned if they don’t.

They never realized that feminism is anti capitalist, and the reason the working men were losing their kids was not because they were male, no, that wasn’t the reason, which was the presumption when there wasn’t enough information.

now that we know better one can clearly see that whomever works ends up being a capitalist, and its the capitalist that gets punished for not taking a state dole, staying home, and having ‘quality time’ in a state of social justice subsistence.

So now women are suddenly finding out that if they work, and their husbands stay home, they get treated like men.

 How dare they!

Then while at the same place I spied another article and followed it through, and its another wakeup call to reality and what has been created in womans name.

Forget this tosh about ‘freemales’ – single women who say they are happy are lying

Ouch, this may be more reality than the UK working women may want to take in one day. Losing their children, dying of heart desease, finding out your wife – i mean husband – played mr mom with some stay at home, stress medical conditions, children calling minimum wage watchers mom, and all the other gifts presented by the ladies of dissent.

Sad truth is that they havent seen nothing yet. My last article told the tale of the reality if infertility, and that its a lot worse than even a pessimist might decide.

This article points out that when the ladies get together they try to prop themselves up with lies about how wonderful life is. Kind of like an old "I Love Lucy" episode where they were caught writing back home and didnt want to tell everyone that they were just a nothing, a cog, and have nothing at home too. But they sure do have a cafe latte lifestyle all full of frivolities to distract and keep busy for someone elses purpose. 

the author is oh so quick to detail what she sees around her with her honest eyes"

In fact, do you believe any single woman over 30 is being honest when she claims to be happy that way? I don’t. 

What’s really going on behind that confident demeanour and fulfilled exterior is crushing loneliness and desperation.
 

Single women become adept at playing the isn’t-life-grand game.
 

They have to do it around men so they don’t appear desperate.
 

And they come to do it around other women, too, as I’ve discovered in the course of counselling hundreds of single women in my work as an agony aunt and life coach.
 

This is what happens when the devil gives you advice and you take it.  You end up leaving paradise for another set of digs that is a lot worse for you, a lot better for the devil you listened to, and no way to get back, because that’s the design.  this is what happens when you betray the trust of those closest to you for the advice of strangers claiming to know it all, and to make change that everyone can be proud of. They didn’t know they were not part of everyone, they were part of the no ones that enable the elite who ARE representative of everyone.

The sad truth is that while pretending to take life seriously, they didnt take life seriously. the didnt take it seriously that its not easy finding a compatible mate, and that the older you are the harder it is (since we get set in our ways). they didnt take fertility seriously, so they are kissing up to 40, when their fertility started declining at 25 (nice soft eugenics population control). they didnt listen when someone said "if we abort all these kids who are going to fund your feminist socailst excesses?".

the truth is that they didnt listen to those that had the answers, they listened to those that had sweet little lies that would con them into giving up their lives to extablish a change so that a bunch of sociopathic control freak harpies could then have enough power and enough control to "remake america".

They used all kinds of words to make being a wage slave glamorous. they gave you sex in the city to show you how much fun it could be (while your own private life called rome burns).  they gave you promises of endless sex, no commitments, a bright future given on a slver platter by the state, children without caring for them, lower crime, higher standards, and so on.

never at any time did most of the women think of not trusting women. never did they realize that they are so gullible they will buy soap with fruit in it. a primitive version of the miser monkey bathing in the scarse wealth of life: food. never did they really ask – HOW.

Dont believe me?

Susie, 38, a music industry lawyer, is a classic case of portraying the sunny single when inside she’s utterly miserable.
 

In therapy sessions with me, she despaired of her secret search for a man.
 

I say "secret search", because two years previously she’d stopped being honest with people and telling them she hoped to settle down, at the very least, with a Mr Maybe Right.
 

Susie felt ashamed of living a lie  -  and finally confessed she always pretends to be cheerful about her single status.
 

"How would other people feel coming back to an empty flat after a long, hard day with no one to talk to or cuddle?
 

"They have no idea how good they’ve got it. Yet I’ve got too much pride to say: ‘I desperately want to meet someone.’"
 

Susie’s not alone in this huge and damaging game of female fakery.
 

No she isn’t. What’s worse is that as she gets older she will trade that single lonely apartment, her "room of her own" for the antiseptic halls of soft euthanasia elder care.  where she gets to enjoy her later years among the halls where the people are not cared for, there is a smell of fluids, and no grandchildren, family, or real friends around.  Her last moments will not be in a room with her loved ones gathered around as it was in the past before women ran the world.

We haven’t gotten that far yet…    that will be the UK Mail piece in 20 years… after they have come to be resigned to their fate as there is nothing else that they can do. After all, 70 is the new 20 is a delusion, not a time machine.

The best part of the article the author draws the attention to the propaganda that is supporting such delusional thinking. That at best its making a circular argument. the exact dialectic that gets a girl to have sex early is the dialectic used on them. The press reports and the ladies pretend and like a bunch of boys in the locker room they think they are freaks if they haven’t had even a little sex. After all everyone else is having lots of it.

Well they are upset that they are abnormal, that they aren’t happy. And everyone else is happy, just look at the sex in the city girls!  And the parties, and all the freedom…  everyone else must be happy and it’s not PC to rock the boat, they may not like it.

Why, like Susie, do they pretend to be a satisfied single? Because when it comes to love and marriage, and romance and relationships, the way we think has changed little over time.

Yes, outwardly women in 2008 are supposed to aspire to careers and self-fulfilment, but inwardly they also long to satisfy an urge that’s been around as long as humankind: to connect with a partner  -  and if their biological clock is ticking  -  to fulfil it and produce children together.

It’s absolute tosh to think it’s any other way. The human species would die out if this weren’t the case.

In her musings, she hits the nail on the head. That it was easier to get women to not have babies or abort them by social manipulation than it would be to march the 47 million into a camp and exterminate them as socialists did in the past.

Those too stupid to not get the game (or unlucky to be partnered with such), were the ones to have their life trees pruned. Every one of us is a living direct line lineage to the first creature that ever was ‘alive’.  A complete and unbroken thread that survived plagues, animals, disasters, other people, wars, starvation, accidents, and more…  All that to be done in by a set of people who changed the values around so that you would miss the bus come time to get to where you REALLY want to be.

If one can change the system when one tricks them, then one only needs to trick them long enough.

Its too late for the majority of these women… it’s also too late for the west since there is no next generation to take up the reigns and progress onward.  Pretty soon there is going to be a lot of old people walking around. not only that but they are going to be old and bitter that the world they were so smart in making never even reached the world they destroyed. So they are not going to vote in a manner that will help the younger generation, they are seculars going out, and there is no moral reason to do so. Is there?

To give an idea of the kind of prison they constructed for themselves:

I once coached a nationally known TV personality in her late 30s  -  I’ll call her Sarah  -  who hated going back to her empty flat after long weeks of filming.

She had an image of being a carefree single, which she felt compelled to maintain.

Privately, though, she was "unhappily unattached" as she called it.

Sarah had invested in a gorgeous flat as her career went from strength to strength.

It was beautifully decorated and she surrounded herself with every luxury. But she was depressed and longed for a partner.

"How do I meet someone when I’m always pretending to be happy the way I am?" she used to ask me.

What a pickle. Men when they worked, worked for family. That personal sacrifice that was belittled meant that women couldn’t find that meaning in work, or else men could. So they are stuck in a vicious mental circle they don’t know how to get out of. This is the problem when you dine with devils. As the trailer for 8mm said "when you dance with the devil the devil don’t change, you do".  So the trick is not learning to dance better, its in learning who not to dance with, who are the devils.

Such things often lead to extremes.

Often I’ve come across women who have sworn to stay away from men after an acrimonious breakup, only to find themselves more lonely than ever.

Sylvie, 46, a charity fundraiser, was in a relationship until the age of 37.

Deeply hurt when her former partner cheated on her, she decided she’d had enough of men "for a few years".

But, on hitting 40, she became increasingly lonely and frustrated by a situation of her own making.

"Once I’d put up a front as a happy single, I found it hard to drop," she told me. 

Sylvie feels a fraud pretending that she’s living life on her terms. She told me that being without a partner was like being a book without a cover.

 The men are saying about now "What happened to fish and bicycles"?

Before the men get too excited, remer what a book cover is for and what happens to it when it can’t do its job.

It sure looks to me that women have a very long long long and lonely road back to where they were when the utopians took them on a wild goose chase. It’s what happens when you chase will o the wisps…  you never catch the lie, and the seeking often destroys you. But that’s from the culture of dead white men, what do they know?

Looks like we can get used to a lot more reality articles, and soul searching articles, and a rich plethora of blame the males for not being everything that women ever wanted.

what we are not going to get is a bunch of happy (older lonely) women.