<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study Attacks Newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/19/study-attacks-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/19/study-attacks-newspapers/</link>
	<description>Opinion Matters</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/19/study-attacks-newspapers/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=79513#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>anti armchair generals, you're blaming "government" for newspapers lies.  You're saying they just pass on "governments" lies without checking.  Only if it falls into a newspapers narrow category of "important news".  What we used to call "propaganda".

Not to say "government never lies", but newspapers are dying because of self-inflicted wounds.  The NYT is whining about loss of circulation and yet it continues to do the same old, same old.  Even as they collapse they blame others.  It couldn't be because they just make stuff up, and everyone knows it (except a few die-hard libs who don't care - but there's not enough of them to float anything).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anti armchair generals, you&#8217;re blaming &#8220;government&#8221; for newspapers lies.  You&#8217;re saying they just pass on &#8220;governments&#8221; lies without checking.  Only if it falls into a newspapers narrow category of &#8220;important news&#8221;.  What we used to call &#8220;propaganda&#8221;.</p>
<p>Not to say &#8220;government never lies&#8221;, but newspapers are dying because of self-inflicted wounds.  The NYT is whining about loss of circulation and yet it continues to do the same old, same old.  Even as they collapse they blame others.  It couldn&#8217;t be because they just make stuff up, and everyone knows it (except a few die-hard libs who don&#8217;t care - but there&#8217;s not enough of them to float anything).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: college activist</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/19/study-attacks-newspapers/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>college activist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=79513#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>With the advent of the internet, mainstream media is gonna have to start getting their act together, or risk obscurity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the advent of the internet, mainstream media is gonna have to start getting their act together, or risk obscurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti armchair generals</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/19/study-attacks-newspapers/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>anti armchair generals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=79513#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>Example from "News and the Culture of Lying"

"Weaver's claim is that journalists and public officials combine to fabricate artificial crises of public policy that end up being "covered in the media, reacted to by the public, and dealt with by government" as if they were real. In short: officials tell lies by inflating the urgency of things, and journalists compound the fraud by passing them along in supposedly objective--but inherently uncritical--ways.

The result, he argues, is both bad government and a journalism that is "stupid and dysfunctional," practiced by reporters who are little more than "dependent, submissive, narcissistic courtiers" to the officials they cover."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Example from &#8220;News and the Culture of Lying&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Weaver&#8217;s claim is that journalists and public officials combine to fabricate artificial crises of public policy that end up being &#8220;covered in the media, reacted to by the public, and dealt with by government&#8221; as if they were real. In short: officials tell lies by inflating the urgency of things, and journalists compound the fraud by passing them along in supposedly objective&#8211;but inherently uncritical&#8211;ways.</p>
<p>The result, he argues, is both bad government and a journalism that is &#8220;stupid and dysfunctional,&#8221; practiced by reporters who are little more than &#8220;dependent, submissive, narcissistic courtiers&#8221; to the officials they cover.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti armchair generals</title>
		<link>http://blogwonks.com/2008/04/19/study-attacks-newspapers/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>anti armchair generals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=79513#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>Alan Korwin,
Sorry if I'm repeating my previous post about Paul Weaver's book "News and the Culture of Lying (Columbia Journalism review). I also agree with "The Uninvited Ombudsman" comments in your column.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3613/is_199411/ai_n8731174</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Korwin,<br />
Sorry if I&#8217;m repeating my previous post about Paul Weaver&#8217;s book &#8220;News and the Culture of Lying (Columbia Journalism review). I also agree with &#8220;The Uninvited Ombudsman&#8221; comments in your column.</p>
<p><a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3613/is_199411/ai_n8731174" rel="nofollow">http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3613/is_199411/ai_n8731174</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
