BLOGWONKS.com is a your online news and blogging partner. Our service is ABSOLUTELY FREE. Just click here to sign up for your free online journal. You can customize your journal to display the latest RSS postings from your favorite websites. You can keep an online journal (or blog), upload images and media files, and even register visitors on your site. Sign up now!


Study Attacks Newspapers

April 19th, 2008 by Alan Korwin

The lamestream media told you:

“Newspapers faulted for errors, dramatizing”

“To regain public trust, newspapers need to do a better job of editing out misspellings and misquotes, curb the use of unnamed sources, and resist the temptation to sensationalize, a study suggests,” reports Deb Reichmann of the AP.

The American Society of Newspaper Editors released its study on why newspaper credibility is on the decline. “We’ve got to cut down on the errors,” ASNE president Ed Seaton said. The study is part of a three-year project to find out why the public has lost confidence in newspapers.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

“It ain’t about spelling errors,” says one unidentifiable newsman. “And what’s a ‘misquote’? Is that where someone says something, and the paper says something different?”

The report, uncovered in a deep stack of clippings at the Uninvited Ombudsman’s office, is from Dec., 1998. Hmmm.

4 Responses to “Study Attacks Newspapers” »

  1. Comment by anti armchair generals — April 19, 2008 @ 9:33 am

    Alan Korwin,
    Sorry if I’m repeating my previous post about Paul Weaver’s book “News and the Culture of Lying (Columbia Journalism review). I also agree with “The Uninvited Ombudsman” comments in your column.

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3613/is_199411/ai_n8731174

  2. Comment by anti armchair generals — April 19, 2008 @ 9:36 am

    Example from “News and the Culture of Lying”

    “Weaver’s claim is that journalists and public officials combine to fabricate artificial crises of public policy that end up being “covered in the media, reacted to by the public, and dealt with by government” as if they were real. In short: officials tell lies by inflating the urgency of things, and journalists compound the fraud by passing them along in supposedly objective–but inherently uncritical–ways.

    The result, he argues, is both bad government and a journalism that is “stupid and dysfunctional,” practiced by reporters who are little more than “dependent, submissive, narcissistic courtiers” to the officials they cover.”

  3. Comment by college activist — April 19, 2008 @ 10:58 am

    With the advent of the internet, mainstream media is gonna have to start getting their act together, or risk obscurity.

  4. Comment by Squiggy — April 20, 2008 @ 1:27 am

    anti armchair generals, you’re blaming “government” for newspapers lies. You’re saying they just pass on “governments” lies without checking. Only if it falls into a newspapers narrow category of “important news”. What we used to call “propaganda”.

    Not to say “government never lies”, but newspapers are dying because of self-inflicted wounds. The NYT is whining about loss of circulation and yet it continues to do the same old, same old. Even as they collapse they blame others. It couldn’t be because they just make stuff up, and everyone knows it (except a few die-hard libs who don’t care - but there’s not enough of them to float anything).

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment


article rss | comments rss | tos | privacy policy


Based on a designed by Web Hosting Geeks and available FREE at WordPress Themes Gallery