BlogWonks

Dictionaries often contain multiple meanings for words. The meanings may or may not have any relation to each other. Useful definitions are those which most aptly fit the meaning of the word in a particular, desired usage. In seeking to find a definition of “junk-science,” especially as it most aptly pertains to domestic abuse law, I offer the following:

The Encarta World English Dictionary defines “junk” for this usage as”

2. rubbish: discarded things, or things regarded as worthless or causing clutter (informal)

4. nonsense: meaningless or worthless talk (informal)

The same dictionary, among it’s multiple definitions of “science,” defines “science” for this usage as:

4. systematic body of knowledge: any systematically organized body of knowledge about a specific subject – the social sciences

5. something studied or performed methodically: any activity that is the object of careful study or that is carried out according to a developed method – treated me to a lecture on the science of dressing for success

Combining the two words “junk” and “science,” based on the above definitions, logically leads one to the following definition for “junk-science”:

# A systematic body of nonsense: any systematically organized body of knowledge about a specific subject, i.e. current domestic abuse law

# Nonsense conjured or fabricated methodically: any activity that is the object of careful study or that is carried out according to a developed method. – tortured me with a lecture on the junk-science of gender feminist, domestic abuse theory

Volumes have been written about domestic abuse, its causes, and it’s solutions. Most of it appears to have been structured carefully to fit the beliefs and goals of a particular political ideology, gender feminism. In the process of creating this current body of domestic abuse nonsense, constructed out of some truth, half-truths and outright lies, much of the logical and ethical methodology of true science has been lost, or more aptly, discarded. There is no body of social “science” work more fallacious, more wrong headed and in need of debunking, in my opinion, than the gender feminists’ domestic abuse theory that has lead to America’s corrupt domestic abuse law.

The asinine, women’s studies theory of Patriarchy, that alleges that all males have special privileges as a result of being males in a Patriarchal society is truly the pinnacle of all junk-science. In further alleging that males use such non-existent privilege to oppress women through violence is not only ignorant, it’s just plain stupid, when considering the forces in society which oppress men even more greatly than women. It takes a truly ignorant, unethical, and arrogant ideology such as gender feminism, to disregard male responsibilities and oppressions, thereby creating a grossly inaccurate theory of Patriarchy, then foisting the scam onto society with a pretentious moral superiority. That society has been duped so badly by this egregious fraud, speaks volumes about the special treatment (special privileges) society as a whole has historically, unquestioningly showered on women to the detriment of men.

At the website “Breaking the Science.” this explanation is offered for the unprofessional way in which much research is conducted in the field of sociology.

http://www.breakingthescience.org/

In “soft” sciences like sociology, it’s much more difficult to detect manipulation of research, than in “hard” sciences like physics. Soft science researchers who strive for objectivity deserve an extra measure of respect. Sadly, far too many researchers are more concerned with pushing an agenda than with objectivity. These same problems are not unknown in the world of journalism. Since the soft sciences and the media have a powerful influence on social policies in this country, this affects every family and every individual.

Obviously, much of BTS’s criticism is directed at the shoddy, social science, advocacy research that has been used to establish much of the published work in the area of domestic abuse theory. Many of the articles on that site are critical of the misconceptions and biases inherent in that body of domestic abuse “junk-science” and yes, “junk-law.”

BTS goes on to say:

These same problems are not unknown in the world of journalism. Since the soft sciences and the media have a powerful influence on social policies in this country, this affects every family and every individual.

Breaking the Science is about the broken “science” that’s being used to create law and drive social policy.

Indeed, mass media is a major part of the problem, when it comes to spreading the half-truths, myths, and outright lies coming out of America’s gender feminist dominated, domestic violence industry. So much propaganda has passed for truth for so long, with so little scholarly refutation, that uncritical thinkers have been brainwashed into believing the vast majority of gender feminist domestic abuse propaganda.

To describe the effects of the systematic, domestic abuse theory discrimination, (perpetrated against all men in America today) as a “tragedy” is actually employing a euphemism. Given the scale of destruction done to the targeted male population, it is more accurate to describe it akin to the beginnings of the holocaust in Nazi Germany, or the institutional persecution of African-Americans in the decades before the civil rights movement.

Tremendous abuse has been inflicted on innocent men through America’s misandrist, and corrupt domestic abuse laws. What we see being done to men in our domestic abuse courts, family law courts, colleges and universities, mass media and other societal institutions in the name of domestic abuse law is a gross national disgrace.

That this 21st century domestic abuse, hate war against men is being conducted with the illusion that sound science supports it, adds to the depth of the injury that is being perpetrated on the innocent male citizens of America. The time is now for good people everywhere (especially those involved in the liberal arts and social sciences) to debunk the domestic abuse law junk-science (and junk-law) that is being used to demonize and persecute men. Shame on American, gender feminism for being the primary force in the furtherance of such junk-science and junk-law.