Sunday, November 23, 2008

BlogWonks

Opinion Matters

Ann Coulter: The Phenomenon.

Posted by Bernard Chapin On November - 29 - 2007

I am the illegal alien of commentary.
I will do the jokes that no one else will do.

—Ann Coulter

It sounds kind of silly to imply that a conservative has the status of a rock star, but Ann Coulter might be the closest rightists come to a figure who makes the news merely by breathing. In recent years she has become an icon, and just about everyone interested in politics has an opinion about her…and usually those opinions are emphatic.

The amazon.com reviews for her latest book, If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans, a collection of quotations from her sizable oeuvre, aptly reveals the split in the public’s perception. At the time of this writing, the compendium has 121 Five Star (excellent) ratings and 105 One Star (terrible) ratings with not a whole lot in between. This is entirely appropriate and Coulter wouldn’t want it any other way.

For conservatives the reasons to admire her are readily apparent. Coulter is a one woman battalion who says things most of us may think but are too civil (or fearful) to say out loud. Yes, albeit unfortunate, the side wishing to preserve western civilization is largely populated by kindly, deferential types who eschew conflict. The majority of us make for poor combatants in the culture war. This state of affairs makes Coulter’s value all the more pronounced. Furthermore, her enemies, for the most part, are our enemies as well, and such a commonality has forged the basis for countless political alliances over the centuries.

Coulter’s fame and esteem among rightists is cause enough for the left to hate her. Indeed, to say she is the Democratic Party’s least favorite conservative is not an understatement. The ever bloviating Ted Kennedy remarked this spring, “Ann Coulter’s words of hate have no place in the public sphere much less our political discourse.” Well, there’s no hate in her statements, but clearly she has as much a right to offend as anyone else in America—particularly if she is provoking outrage from our cowardly, statist politicians. In comparison to Senator Kennedy, I find her observations downright soothing.

At least the monstrous drunkard from Massachusetts was content to attack her with rhetoric alone. In the past, other radicals have thrown pies at her, sabotaged her biographical entry on Wikipedia, arranged to have her jumped on television shows, and spun rumors that she is a transvestite.

Pseudo-liberal outrage over her utterances is but self-parody as Coulter says what she does in the hopes of provoking her enemies. Her tactics have been enormously successful. PC automatons line up on television to express their self-righteous condemnation practically every time she opens her mouth. Their animosity and invective showcase that it is they, as opposed to the blond Page Six entry, who are the real haters in our society. Their faux indignation only serves to highlight their own shallowness and conformity, however.

The left’s ire in regards to Coulter is chiefly a result of two factors. First, emotion—as opposed to detached logical evaluation—is the essence of her fame and reputation. Despite the outstanding intellectual arguments she sometimes makes, her affective responses are the reason for why she is a household name. This is deeply resented by pseudo-liberals because they see her style as one which subsumes their own. Without emotion and conclusions based on irrational premises there would be no Democratic Party and no political left whatsoever.

Coulter’s humorous advice, “[j]ust call them traitors and let them sort it out,” inflames her foes as she uses their methods against them. Where would sensitivity statists in America be without the brandishing of isms? Answer: Out of office. If they could not dub their opponents names like racist then they would have to explain why they hold government and “the poor” to be synonymous terms. That’s the second to last thing they want. The first are opponents every bit as rude as they are.

Her ridicule is something they cannot handle. Radical feminists are well known for their obtuseness and lack of wit so imagine how irate they become after hearing Coulter describe an ideal abstinence kit as containing “an 8×10 glossy of Susan Estrich.” That is a hysterical quip, but also one that is highly accurate.

Truth is the second reason for the left’s disdain. Nothing infuriates them more than the truth and Coulter pronounces it publicly on a regular basis. “Veritas parit odium,” the truth begets hatred, which is exactly what happens when one shares reality with our elites; those same elites who look down on us from their perches atop government, the universities, and the mainstream media. They prefer not to be reminded of the fact that most of their state-sponsored “solutions” only manage to exacerbate existing social pathologies. These magnates prefer to play pretend games wherein their every socialist inclination ends up “helping” someone.

Coulter elucidates this eventuality in the following sentence: “[E]very time the government tries to help the poor it ends up removing the marvelous incentives life provides to do things like buy an alarm clock, get a job, keep your knees together before marriage, and generally become a productive, happy member of society.” Short, irreverent, funny, and also more descriptive of the dole than anything ever spun by Nancy Pelosi or Barack Obama.

Yes, calling someone a traitor is not an effective argument in itself, but it does aptly describe the mindset of the PC-nik. These individuals regard America as being a racist, sexist entity so why on earth would they ever want to defend it? Answer: They wouldn’t. They pray [sic] that our shores soon become inhabited by new diverse peoples who will assuage their pseudo-liberal guilt by transplanting our indigenous culture with charming societal accoutrements such as Sharia or election via coup d’etat.

These leftists care nothing for our Constitution and wish to breathe life into it…until it is dead. To them, America will always be “Amerika.” With sophist ease they have redefined patriot with its antonym. The word now refers to a person who reflexively criticizes their own country whenever possible. Clearly, traitor is a term which embodies them.

The mainstream media responds to Coulter the entertainer, but makes a point of ducking her logical arguments. They depict her as being an airhead yet she knows her foes far better than they know themselves. Even her intentionally outrageous stuff—“Most newspapers in the red states-even nice states like Mississippi-are run by loser liberals who rub their foreskin while reading the New York Times”—illustrates the depth of her analysis. Journalists and yuppies are the only two remaining groups of Americans who retain any admiration for the slanted operation that once dubbed itself, “the paper of record.”

I am very grateful for her presence in the public square; although, duty necessitates my providing prospective purchasers of If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans with a warning. Those readers who already own her books would be wise to pass on this one. There’s precious little here that hasn’t been said (and excoriated) before. Besides, one can access her online columns for free.

In summation, in regards to Ms. Coulter, I have said it before but will say it again—she may be the most important conservative in America. Not only is the scorn she showers upon the left well-deserved, it also enables her peers to speak freely. Like Valderrama, Ballack, Zidane or any other brilliant soccer midfielder, Coulter’s thrusts and counterstrokes create space within which the rest of us can roam and prosper. We should be allowed to say what we want in our private lives without fear of termination, prison or banishment.

I will concede that the uttering of verboten syllables is not a cause for celebration, but by lampooning PC she helps roll back the invasive boundaries of the sensitivity state. We badly need her. Whatever one thinks of her personality, all rightists owe her a debt of gratitude because everyday she acts as a lightning rod…on our behalf.

Bernard Chapin is the author of Women: Theory and Practice and Escape from Gangsta Island. He can be contacted at veritaseducation@gmail.com.

11 Responses

  1. amfortas Said,

    11/10

    Posted on November 29th, 2007 at 9:33 pm

  2. Joyanna Adams Said,

    Thanks Mr. Chapin for that wonderful piece on this incredible, brave warrior for the truth. Not only does she speak with no fear…. she is an incredible writer.

    A goddess sent from the almighty… may she continue to bless us with her genius.

    Posted on November 29th, 2007 at 10:10 pm

  3. Ed Said,

    Another fine one Bernie. Really, when I read about liberals. most especially Kennedy, the only thing that has come to mind for decades now is “those that demand tolerance the most - tolerate the least”. That and don’t get in a car with the guy. He’s been on the Hyannis compound far too long and has no clue whats going on anymore. The Kennedy thing was so over in the 70’s. The guy means well but so did lil Adolf. He’s rode the wave and like OJ is allowed to do/say whatever by a jury of his peers.

    Posted on November 30th, 2007 at 3:40 am

  4. TheManOnTheStreet Said,

    I love her because she says what needs to be said. And the libs are always afraid to slander her because… well… she still is a woman after all.

    “Most newspapers in the red states-even nice states like Mississippi-are run by loser liberals who rub their foreskin while reading the New York Times”

    Anti-male sexist crap? Maybe… Truthful? Damned straight!

    TMOTS

    Posted on November 30th, 2007 at 8:15 am

  5. CaptDMO Said,

    “Anti-male sexist crap? Maybe…”
    Oh,..I don’t know…
    She never stated those rubbed foreskins were actually attached to
    those editors own bodies!

    Posted on November 30th, 2007 at 10:18 am

  6. TheManOnTheStreet Said,

    Capt,

    DOH! Touche!

    TMOTS

    Posted on December 1st, 2007 at 8:36 am

  7. NotNOW Said,

    “Yes, albeit unfortunate, the side wishing to preserve western civilization is largely populated by kindly, deferential types who eschew conflict.”

    This is precisely what has to change.

    Posted on December 1st, 2007 at 10:59 am

  8. Ozark Said,

    As much as I despise the liberal PC crowd, I find this puff piece as ridiculous as some of her rants. She is nothing more than a self-aggrandizing c**t who must have a good editor because her on-the-fly rhetoric lacks cohesion and coherence. If you think her intellectual depravity speaks in favor of men or the important political issues of the day then your diet must consist of frozen pizza and light beer.

    Posted on December 1st, 2007 at 2:40 pm

  9. David R. Usher Said,

    Excellent piece. Coulter is a rare individual who sees through all the Marcusian directions America is taking. And, she is capable of turning their mindset around and using it against them. Her analogies are hilarious.

    But, Coulter does not always get it right. Like most conservatives, she hates Castro so much that she was unable to get to the truth of the Elian Conzalez case. That was a plain-and-simple parental rights case, which hinged on whether or not the state of Florida could assert jurisdiction over Elian under UCCJA (thats what the child-savers attempted to do when they could not find a hole in immigration laws). Under UCCJA, the state cannot assert jurisdiction until a child has been in the state for six months. Since Elian’s father came to get him within that six month period, there was nothing to be done except hand the child over. And, while there were all sorts of manufactured stories about child abuse, it was pretty obvious they were rumor mill material — and the state chose not to hear them for that very reason.

    Most conservatives still have no clue that destruction of parental rights has resulted in over half of all children being taken into custody of the state — violating one of Reagan’s strongest tenets. The state cannot raise children and must not fund the destruction of marriage. We need a free marriage market.

    Those who hate Castro should turn the mirror abound and look at Amerika. Castro socialized business, and Cuba has no businesses to speak of. America socialized the family, demolishing marriage, causing an explosion of a long list of unmitigable social and economic pathologies that 2008 Presidential candidates are dancing around without mentioning. And then we handle the huge mass of problems by further entitling them with about $700 billion in federal expenditures for HHS each year — the largest and fastest-growing line item in the federal budget (see http://www.federalbudget.com/ ).

    Phyllis Schlafly was quite unhappy with me over ACFC’s role in winning the Gonzalez case. But over time she came around and realized that we were right.

    Perhaps Coulter will walk away from her political dislike for Castro long enough to set the Gonzalez case right for the rest of conservatives, and then to attack the core problem: Amerika turned radical feminism into an entitled activity in every related federal and state body, as well as every eductional institution, and now we wonder why we have problems. If we don’t like Saudi Arabia teaching hate of Amerika in its Madrassas, we had better do something about the teaching of hate by feminists all up and down our governmental and educational systems.

    Posted on December 2nd, 2007 at 11:59 am

  10. operation gratitude Said,

    [...] Ann Coulter: The Phenomenon. [...]

    Posted on December 4th, 2007 at 10:30 am

  11. DeeDee Said,

    Robert Paul Reyes:

    Don’t dishonor your last name like this. I pray you really check your heart. What comes out of the mouth, comes from deep within. Do you not have any morals?

    Posted on October 2nd, 2008 at 7:10 am

Add A Comment