I have been reading David Horowitz’s new book, Indoctrination U and have found many of the observations in parallel with my own experiences in taxpayer funded, American institutions of higher education - especially in the area of taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs.In My Opinion:
The prejudice and discrimination that is allowed to be preached and practiced in taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs across America is astounding.
Perhaps the demonstration in front of a California University with a taxpayer funded, women’s studies program (included at the end of this article) will add some graphic perspective to problems that exist today in taxpayer funded women’s studies programs.
The two photos at the very end are taken in front of a California Police Station, and a California City Hall. Those two photos are meant to emphasize how the misandry, taught in taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs, has transformed into so much bad social policy and law. Many taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs, in addition to teaching, also offer internships to students to train and lobby in Washington, D.C. Therefore, if you don’t consider taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs a religion, then just consider them a taxpayer funded political party. You know how it works in a Stalinist country’s politics, where all those lines are very blurred. Well, that’s the model taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs in America aspire to.
There are approximately 52 taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs in California and none for men. There are hundreds of classes taught in those programs, if not thousands. How again, is that supposed to work under Title IX? Somebody please explain that to me.
Patriarchy Theory (a foundation block of taxpayer funded, women’s studies):
# It can be shown that men are indeed oppressed in numerous ways and not all receipients of some vast Patriarchal network’s endless benevolence to all men. Where then, is the universal “male privilege” that taxpayer funded, women’s studies advocates have been touting?
# It can be shown that the vast majority of men are not members of a Patriarchal conspiracy to oppress all women. Where then, is any justification for the vilification of all males that has been rampant in taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs?
# The concept of Patriarchy as taught in taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs is flawed to the core, and does not consider men as individual human beings as our United States Constitution intends. Taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs blatantly violate the human rights of every individual American male.
Taxpayer funded, women’s studies programs are not content to exist just within the women’s studies discipline, or even the liberal arts dept. Taxpayer funded, women’s studies activists are constantly lobbying academic administration to have their curriculums integrated into the curriculums of many disciplines, where it seems oddly out of place – Geography, Physics, Mathematics, etc., etc., etc. Where is the academic freedom of individual departments to ”choose,” what goes into their own disciplines, based on their own scholarly expertise?
Taxpayer funded women’s studies programs have justified teaching from the woman’s perspective, in the women’s studies discipline, because (in their words) ”women’s studies is about women.” Yet when women’s studies advocates lobby academic administration to integrate (foist) taxpayer funded women’s studies curriculum into other disciplines, the taxpayer funded women’s studies curriculum does not change. It does not include the oppression of men. It does not show ways in which women have many privileges in our society that men do not enjoy. It does not talk honestly about domestic violence committed against men by women, or the absences of shelters and services for men. It does not talk about the horrendous number of child fatalities attributed to women by HHS, nor lobby for remedy, etc., etc., etc.
Taxpayer funded, women’s studies curriculum cannot withstand objective, logical, methodical, analysis and remain valid. Even though “women’s ways of knowing” professes to be a valid form of “knowing,” the contradictions and factual inaccuracies resultant from its “research” appear to me to be damning indictments of such a “fuzzy,” unsound methodology – so why is this apparent “taxpayer funded, hate movement,” (vilifying all men) still in existence anywhere in America’s college and university systems?
Taxpayer funded, gender feminist, women’s studies curriculum is not fit to be accredited for teaching in any college or university class anywhere in America, IMO!
